Topic: recording

hey guys and girls. So I've been in the studio with my band lingo recording a cd with john keane (widespread panic, rem, indago girls) and I just thought it was cool that john blends amp just like joe. It sounds amaising.
Peace.    Dylan

Re: recording

so who are you? did you post an intro?

nice to meet u

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

Re: recording

Yeah Nic, I don't get it either.  Um welcome...

Rock On & Keep the FAITH
             It is
Blues From the Bottoms

4 (edited by lingoguitar 2008-04-11 16:06:35)

Re: recording

yea i posted an intro about last week. so i am new to the forum. but  nice to meet you guys .im a jb fan and guitar player which seems to be about everyone here. ha. but thanks for the welcomes.
Dylan

Re: recording

well lingo -


I JUST BOUGHT a Line6 Toneport UX2

The Gearbox software connects online for presets....it can copy VanHalen, Metallica, Hendrix, Creme... etc!  its so great. Its much like a toy because you can dial up tones you've heard before...and its pretty believable. But aside from that, you can dial up a 58 bassman, a 1990 JCM 800, or any cabinet you can think of....along with some legendary pedals.  It sounds great through headphones.

I haven't brought it into garageband yet. But I have high hopes for it.  All i need to do now is get a better microphone, since the one I have is very crappy - any suggestions?

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

Re: recording

SM 58

Rock On & Keep the FAITH
             It is
Blues From the Bottoms

7 (edited by JohnTB 2008-04-14 09:05:19)

Re: recording

SM58 for vox take the grille off for guitars n stuff (thats the only dif between the 58 and 57)

Re: recording

NPB_EST.1979 wrote:

All i need to do now is get a better microphone, since the one I have is very crappy - any suggestions?

Basically the SM57 is the industry standard for micing amps and drums (but it can be used for vocals) and the SM58 is the standard for vocals...

"Interestingly, according to modern astronomers, space is finite. This is a very comforting thought-- particularly for people who can never remember where they have left things." - Woody Allen

http://www.last.fm/user/skynyrd128

Re: recording

I got a Beta 58

never give up, never slow down
never grow old, never ever die young

Re: recording

gsj wrote:

I got a Beta 58

Hey how is that?  cheaper?  well?

Rock On & Keep the FAITH
             It is
Blues From the Bottoms

11 (edited by gsj 2008-04-14 18:05:34)

Re: recording

Hell no....more money! But I pay trade prices only wink

bigjeffjones wrote:
gsj wrote:

I got a Beta 58

Hey how is that?  cheaper?  well?

never give up, never slow down
never grow old, never ever die young

Re: recording

bigjeffjones wrote:

SM 58

In the words of Orleans' song,..."still the one". The most widely used, durable, great sounding, not exhorbitantly priced (as in "cheap", yes, by price only, but this is world class value) pro dynamic mic, period.   That's Shure SM-58, cardioid (means mostly what is right in front & center of the mic gets in, other sounds are attenuated and effectively "stay out").  Versatile and does the job whether in the garage, on the stage, doing live stage recording, or studio.  Top that!!!
Get several. Don't graduate to anything else for vocals until you've used one.  You can ALWAYS sell one used.

They are  great for micing instruments too-drop the midrange -3dB around 5kHz and and slightly boost at 6.3 or/and or 8 khz to accentuate the highs a bit, and greatly boost (+6dB to +10dB) at 12.5kHz and 16kHz & you'll do alright.

Conversely, also it is ok to use an SM-57 for vocals.  If you're going to get deep throated or screeechy screamy or metal demon mega dB's going through it, though, use an inline -3db pad (attenuator) or a selectable one. 100 Hz will likely need about a +3dB boost unless you have a very very deep singing voice.  These are given assuming a graphic EQ.  To tailor with  parametric EQ you'd better be an expert !!! wink

The betas are pricey and mostly about isolation of off-axis sound (super cardioid pattern). Mic placement (always a big part of the sound) can go a long way to make up the differences if you are budget minded.

Rock On & Keep the Faith,
Rocket

"He still doesn't charge for mistakes! wink"
http://jbonamassa.com/tour-dates/
"Everybody wants ta get inta the act!"
“Now, this isn’t your ordinary party crowd, here.  I mean, there are professionals in here.”

Re: recording

There the same mic the 57 and 58 but with different heads,

"Bruce Bartlett07-29-2000, 20:31
I was a microphone engineer at Shure.

The SM57 and SM58 are essentially the same, except that the SM57 was intended mainly for instruments and the SM58 for vocals. The SM58 has a ball grille that acts as a pop filter. The two mics have the same proximity effect at the same miking distance.

Because of its smaller grille, the SM57 lets you get closer to it for more bass boost. But if you are 2 inches from the diaphragm in either mic, they have the same bass boost.

They have a slightly different response at high frequencies because of the acoustical effects of the different grilles.

Hope this helps..."

I had an argument about this a while back with someone I was playing with.

Used the beta 58a at open mics always seems louder then the rest can't say I noticed anything else but then again noisey pubs arnt the best place to base opinions.

Re: recording

i was talking about vocals....not micing amps.

i'm getting good guitar sounds.

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

15 (edited by Rocket 2008-04-16 20:14:16)

Re: recording

It's impossible to get exactly the same response with different screens...extremely and essentially similar, indeed, but yes the proximity effect is purely a function of the cardioid polar patterns reinforcing the bass freq's and distance which has an accessibility and overtone aspect that will still color things different, of course low frequencies much less so, negligible even.  SO, given that an SM-57 lets the mic get closer to the sound source for proximity bass boost, conversely being equidistant AWAY from a sound source would/should presumably back off on the boost to the same degree, but not entirely true... even though internally they have essentially the same element-diaphragm, and windings, and yoke.  The physical differences are in the cases and grills, overall weight (mass) and a very slight impedance and sensitivity difference make for differing response also.  Hence the opposing normal uses: SM-57, intruments; SM-58, vocals.  Peace and good luck!

Rock On Keep the Faith,
Rocket

P.S.-My EQ recommendations for reverse usages more or less assumes use of a set of one kind, i.e. ALL SM-58'S or ALL SM-57 for the vocal & instrument setup of a sound reinforcement application or studio ("garage", "home, or "semi-pro", "demo", etc ) recording or a single use situation for one "track" or "take" of a recording

JohnTB wrote:

There the same mic the 57 and 58 but with different heads,

"Bruce Bartlett07-29-2000, 20:31
I was a microphone engineer at Shure.

The SM57 and SM58 are essentially the same, except that the SM57 was intended mainly for instruments and the SM58 for vocals. The SM58 has a ball grille that acts as a pop filter. The two mics have the same proximity effect at the same miking distance.

Because of its smaller grille, the SM57 lets you get closer to it for more bass boost. But if you are 2 inches from the diaphragm in either mic, they have the same bass boost.

They have a slightly different response at high frequencies because of the acoustical effects of the different grilles.

Hope this helps..."

I had an argument about this a while back with someone I was playing with.

Used the beta 58a at open mics always seems louder then the rest can't say I noticed anything else but then again noisey pubs arnt the best place to base opinions.

"He still doesn't charge for mistakes! wink"
http://jbonamassa.com/tour-dates/
"Everybody wants ta get inta the act!"
“Now, this isn’t your ordinary party crowd, here.  I mean, there are professionals in here.”

Re: recording

NPB_EST.1979 wrote:

i was talking about vocals....not micing amps.

i'm getting good guitar sounds.

Then SM-58 hands down!

"He still doesn't charge for mistakes! wink"
http://jbonamassa.com/tour-dates/
"Everybody wants ta get inta the act!"
“Now, this isn’t your ordinary party crowd, here.  I mean, there are professionals in here.”

Re: recording

SM 58 again and still.  That's a lot of science Rocket.  Thank you.

Rock On & Keep the FAITH
             It is
Blues From the Bottoms

Re: recording

Rocket wrote:
NPB_EST.1979 wrote:

i was talking about vocals....not micing amps.

i'm getting good guitar sounds.

Then SM-58 hands down!

you're now ahead of me on the top 10 list. dang it!

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool