So the axe is starting to fall.
Both Caterham and Marussia will miss the final 2 races of the season, and in all likelihood we won't see these two teams in their current guise again. Personally I find it a great shame, especially so as Bianchi still lays critically ill in hospital.
F1 does itself absolutely no favours. 18 cars on the grid for these last 2 races and no one should forget how close Sauber came to disappearing earlier in the year and even Force India were unable to pay bills at the beginning of the year.
The money the teams get first of all, is only a fraction of what is being taken by Bernie's employers, but I have no sympathy for them in this respect as they were too spineless to force a better deal. But the money they do get is unequally distributed amongst the competing teams. They are all part of the show, so it makes no sense that Marussia (or Caterham or previoulsy HRT) should get no bonus money for finishing last. They have similar fixed transport costs as the others and yet are deprived of the income.
All three teams came into F1 as a result of the FIA's plans to reduce the costs of GP racing back in 2009. Max Mosley's idea wasn't at all hare-brained, not unless you were the principal of Ferrari, RedBull or McLaren and latterly Mercedes. Now, they might have egg on their faces as under the terms of the contracts they signed they may well be obliged a 3rd car each to make the numbers up.
This would definitely improve the show as a 3rd RedBull is going to be much more competitive than a Caterham, but this would be bad news for Force India and Sauber! Cheaper option would be if they all got together and put a financial package together to rescue both Marussia and Caterham, part fund them for the next 3 years and use them to bring forward their next tranche of young drivers in the way RedBull do with TorroRosso.
Trouble is that the ego's and snobbery of F1 would rather see these 2 teams fold, 400 people lose their jobs, whilst they wring their hands and blame somebody else.
F1 has been great this year, thanks to Mercedes, but that in itself shows it to be a one (or two) horse show. That isn't good for the sustainability of the sport. Mosley was right, the new engine formula has been introduced under the wrong parameters. Renault should have only got their way if the could prove they could supply the motors for under 6 million dollars a year to teams instead of the 15-20 they are costing. Of course, Renault and the others say costs will eventually come down as the cost is spread over a longer term. Trouble is, how many teams will there be left by then?
It is a great shame. Marussia (nee Manor) and Caterham (nee Lotus) were conned to come into F1. No sooner had they committed to it the goalposts were moved. They have admirably continued and received very little for their effort, enthusiasm and dogged determination in the face of insurmountable odds. Sad that their legacy might be remembered only for the tragic events of Suzuka this year.
Rant over..........
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph … NDgxNDAwS0
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.ph … ostpopular
No Hits, No Hype.......................Classic Rock Jan 2012