ohiodawg13 wrote:Do you cycling fans share the same view for Barry Bonds, Mark Maguire, Sammy Sosa, Rodger Clemens, etc., etc., etc.!!!
Rock The Vote!!!
J Dawg
I don't know enough detail about the various baseball steroid cases down the years to make any meaningful comparisons, AND I don't want to turn this topic into a general doping discussion because that discussion is truly endless.
Agree with Curby that sadly, we live in an era where cheating has become more the norm than the exception. Cycling is merely the most high profile sport as far as widespread and organized abuse goes, but I'm sure that there is also much cheating in other sports, though probably more on an individual, rather than on an organized team basis.
The salient difference between LA and others who have either been caught through testing, or who have held their hands up and confessed, is that LA is still denying everything, despite all the first hand witness testimony.
Ian, I wore my wife's yellow band from the day of her death in 2007 until earlier this year, when I could no longer stomach the hypocrisy of openly appearing to support LA, even though for me it was just wearing something of her's. We supported Livestrong by buying and giving away yellow bands from the time that they were introduced in 2004, when my wife was already sick - so yes, I totally understand why people think of Livestrong in a positive way with regard to somehow helping in the fight against cancer.
Be clear about one thing though, LA the person, and Livestrong the organizations, have always been totally intertwined. There is a livestrong.org, but there is also a livestrong.com. LA has personally made a fortune off Livestrong donations. Just one example -
On one weekend in 2005, as the seven time Tour winner, he pocketed in excess of half a million dollars for doing two rides with a bunch of wealthy Canadian cyclists who had each paid $35k to Livestrong for the privilege! They found out afterwards, that their receipts only showed a 'donation' of $25k because $10k of each donation went straight into LA's pocket.
Meanwhile, ASO, the company that runs the Tour, is claiming $3m back from LA. And then there's this, some of you may remember this case, it was pretty high profile at the time -
Lance Armstrong asked to pay $11m to US insurance company
By Simon Austin BBC Sport
A Texan insurance company is pursuing Lance Armstrong for $11m (£6.9m).
SCA Promotions insured performance bonuses paid to the American after he claimed his fourth, fifth and sixth Tour de France victories.
As the International Cycling Union (UCI) has now stripped Armstrong of his seven Tour titles, SCA will demand the money back from Armstrong.
"We will make a formal demand for return of funds," SCA's lawyer, Jeffrey M. Tillotson, told BBC Sport.
"If this is not successful, we will initiate formal legal proceedings against Mr Armstrong in five business days (Monday 29 October)."
The insurance policy was taken out by Tailwind Sports, owner of the US Postal team, to cover performance bonuses that would be due to Armstrong if he won the Tours.
SCA initially refused to pay out money covering the bonus for Armstrong's sixth Tour de France win in 2004, totalling $5m, because it argued Armstrong was not a clean rider.
Armstrong took the company to an arbitration hearing in Dallas in 2005 and won, because the contract between the parties stipulated the insurance money would be payable if Armstrong was the "official winner" of the Tour.
It meant SCA was forced to pay out $7.5m - a $5m bonus, plus $2.5m in interest and legal fees.
RIP Iron Man
Rock On and keep the Faith