Re: Gibson guitar at center of rock feud.....
Tripod wrote:i don't understand how you can't note the difference between a telecaster and a les paul...
Yes of course there is a difference and for what it's worth he did sound better with the Les Paul, but the volume and the pointless solos did not impress. It was clear Gary was playing only for himself, yet an experienced musician should be able to pick up on audience reaction. I got the impression many of his long term fans will not go to see him next time. It's no exaggeration to say that Joe Bonamassa and others have raised the standard of what people feel they are entitled to expect.
Of course Gary has made some great music, I like some of his rock albums like Run For Cover and of course his work with Thin Lizzy. His early blues albums like SGTB and Blues for Greeny provided me with an entry to the blues. I have previously defended him on this forum in the past, but having seen him live that has all changed. His attitude towards his paying public, and fellow professionals defies belief and it's losing him fans. I could elaborate, but I feel I'd be wasting my time doing so.
As for Ronnie Montrose, I'm not that familiar with his music, but I know his original band were highly influential on modern metal bands such as Iron Maiden who covered some of his songs. I hope there is a satisfactory resolution.
Greenose, I agree with your comments absolutely. He is one of the greats - no doubt in my mind. I have signed ticket stubs from his 'Midnight Blues Band' RAH gig and I have seen him on many, many other occasions. I consider myself as Germans would say an 'über fan' so I know I what I am talking about.
Even so, when I last saw him 6 months ago, I knew it would be the last time perhaps. His attitude and general approach was even more brusque than normal. The camera and video police were much in evidence and some viewing areas in the vicinity of the stage were blocked off.
I can understand if after 30 years of camera flashes in his face he doesn't want that anymore but then he could overcome that by just asking us not to. His fans would appreciate the interaction and he would have their respect. Even if he doesn't want to chat to the fans in person there are so many other ways to communicate these days ; blogs from the road, website, forums etc etc. Keeping us tuned in, stops fans turning off.
Tripod - I've listened to your clips and from your playing and sound has a similar 'edge' to Gary's sometimes so you are a fan too and I am sure you can understand that being the great virtuoso isn't enough if you can't display similar grace towards your paying public.
I think I also have a good ear and I can differentiate between different types of guitar. Let me tell you, the ONLY difference between his beautiful Tele and the Les Paul was that the Tele was set to "Permanent Ear Damage" level. Any other aural subtleties were unidentifiable.
As far as the Ronnie Montrose thing is concerned, if he says it was his and was stolen then it probably was. As a travelling musician, Gary of all people should appreciate what it must be like to lose your favourite guitar. He could emerge the bigger man by giving it back - no questions asked. It casts no reflection on how Gary acquired it.
It saddens me that I find myself writing and reading about Gary in a negative light. It doesn't alter the fact that he has written recorded and performed magnificent music and that he may continue to do so. I just hope he can find a way to present not just his spectacular talent but also a more fan friendly personality. IT IS IMPORTANT