Topic: ABR bridge "upgrade"???
Hi all,
I'm writing this topic to get your preferences on Gibson bridges.
Back in the mid 90's I got rid of my Nashville bridge from my '72 Les Paul and '79 Explorer in favor of an ABR-1 bridge so I could tighten the tailpiece to the body. People "say" these are better bridges and an "upgrade" from Nashville bridges.
The ABR bridge wires are noisy and rattles. the retainer wire only loosely holds the saddle pieces in there, and I'm not convinced it is truly an upgrade from the more sturdy Nashville bridge. The saddle pieces can even slide forward using your finger cause the wire won't keep it in place. On other guitars, I've seen the wire hump or bow up far enough touch the strings affecting tone and sustain.
One of the reasons for the ABR-1 was so when you drop the tailpiece down all the way, the string won't prematurely hit the side of the bridge before it touches the saddle. I've since noticed that if you topwrap your strings, you can get away with still using a Nashville bridge to avoid this bottoming out.
Part of the reason I believe people say ABR-1 bridges are the way to go is because they are a vintage design. I think it is a flawed design, however, for reasons stated above.
I've since fixed by two ABR-1 bridges by having the wire retainers replaced with tighter ones. I've seen other people bend the wire down in between each bridge screw to try and keep the parts from moving. I don't think I'd ever swap out a perfectly working Nashville bridge again.
what do you think?
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping.
