Beerdog80 wrote:stratpaulguy86 wrote:I wonder how close Gibson's current Burstbuckers are to the real-deal PAF's. There was a video on youtube of this guy demoing a R9 with Burstbuckers vs. a real 1959 Les Paul and I was hard pressed to hear a difference. I think the actual guitar probably has more to do with the overall tonality instead the pickups which just amplifies that basic foundation. You would think that the company that pioneered the humbucking pickup would be able to 100% reproduce those "magic" late '50s PAFs due to our vast improvement in technology/quality control. What the deuce Gibson, offer a 100% accurate PAF clone- not an "improvement" or "PAF-style" pickup!
Your forgetting that origional PAF's were not even consistent and the tone is debatable. One set might sound great and the other might not. The Burstbucker is a PAF LIKE pup..not an exact copy. Meaning they took the qualities that was most liked about the PAF's and went out and made the Burstbucker.
$175 for a set of balanced pups from Spiders friend sounds like a pretty good deal. The fact you can send them back no questions asked is also pretty cool. Shows he stands behind his product. I'm in no way taking anything away from other winders out there so best bet would be to try out as many different pups as you can to make your own judgment.
I will say that my recent pup quest ended up with me settling on the BB 1 and 2 combo in my SG Standard. I put my Bareknuckle Mule pups in another LP and tried out SD's (the antiquities are awesome), Lollar, WB, and a couple others. While all of these are amazing pickups, I settled on the BB's because I got them used for $75 and flipped the magnet on the neck.
I completely agree with you on the fact that many guitars, pickups, hardware were completly inconsistent back in the "golden age". I remember reading a quote from Leo Fender actually saying that the newer guitars being built were in many ways as good or superior to the old ones. Not to say that there wasn't a certain "mojo" in some of those magic examples of the perfect PAF or strat PU, but today's technology has pretty much worked out the kinks. Which makes me wonder why some of the guys at Gibson who own great examples of old PAF equipped LPs, SGs, 335s etc can't make a faithful clone. BTW I love my BB 1&2/ BB Pro sets in my LP and SG. Maybe Gibson thinks that the current PU are better?!?
'67 and '74 Fender Twin Reverbs, '74 Marshall 1987 lead mkII, Metro Superlead 100. Pedals from TC Electronic, Ibanez, Dunlop, BK Butler, Electro-Harmonix, Fulltone, Maestro/Gibson, Loopmaster switching, VoodooLab, Boss. Gibson and Fender guitars, Dimarzio pickups.