Thank you Jim for the extremely kind words. It's most appreciated. I too respect your opinion, and I do see your point of view 100 %.
Perhaps I should clarify my words a little bit further. Do I think that BDS are an extremely talented band? Yes. Are they among the top of young blues rock bands at this time? Yes, I do believe so. But are they at a level of a Joe Bonamassa? No. Not yet. Joe is one of the most amazing performers I've had the pleasure of witnessing in my lifetime, and BDS are not at that level yet. They know it as well. I disagreed when Davy Knowles told me earlier this year that they weren't even worthy of sharing the stage with Joe. And I still disagree. But they're still an extremely young band, one whom is continually getting better, and will continue to do so, with touring and experience. That's something which can't be taught from a book, or listening to records, even playing together. That takes time and seasoning. There's no shortcut to that. But that goes as well for any of the extremely talented, promising players and bands, many of whom I have championed here, and elsewhere.
There is also something called overhype, which if it is pressed onto a performer/artist too heavily, can even have the opposite effect. Not only does it in many cases cause a backlash, but the pressures of living up to such hype can make an artist falter when attempting to live up to it. It's a dangerous line between enthusiasm and overhype, and a hard one to walk, that's for sure. But given the level of songwriting, playing and singing at this point, they are certainly ahead of the curve creatively speaking. Can they, or Knowles be compared to Clapton? They can be compared to, yes, but definitely not to that level yet. Clapton was creating a type of playing that hadn't been experienced until he came along, and he brought an original voice, guitar -wise to the table. Even Joe is still struggling with finding an original sound. It's SO difficult these days when you're working against decades of innovation, tradition and progression, to come up with something new and different.
One thing I do give major props to these new young bands about is that they're choosing this music by choice. They could go in any direction, musically speaking, and there are many genres which would be extremely more lucrative, at least outwardly, to be exploring, than a classic rock/blues route. They're facing a long road, with hardly any radio exposure, no video channels playing their music, and although it's quite apparent that there's a massive movement going on now with young musicians pursuing a neo classic style, there's certainly no guarantee that the bubble will burst and massive success will happen. Although I must say the landscape is so much more promising for that to happen, with the success of Guitar Hero, Rock Band etc. paving the way.
I was extremely impressed seeing this band live. It was a headlining situation, and perhaps it's different when it's not. Or it could have been an off night. Or, they just didn't move you Jim. It's entirely possible. One of the great things about music is that it means different things to different people.
Nightwatcher's House Of Rock
http://nightwatchershouseofrock.blogspot.com/Now featured on Planet Rock, The Chicago Sun Times and The Mog Music Network
Also featured on antiMUSIC's RockNewsinfo at
http://www.antimusic.com/rocknews/