Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

thestepchild wrote:

Well I knew nobody would "touch" this subject. I know we all have a band that is huge,but we don't care for. Ok lets do the opposite.......What CD is still in your rotation that you don't want anyone to know you listen to. You know, that song you crank up when in your car but too embarrassed to admit.(sorta like Chris Farley and David Spade with The Carpenters HA!!)

James Morrison shhhhhh I think he is awesome

You Can Do Anything You Want To Do

20 (edited by Deezer 2008-04-18 17:31:06)

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

thestepchild wrote:

I never once said I didn't respect what they have done. I also understand their place in music history. I (the key word is I) just don't understand how some of those bands are where they are and some awesome musicians are still working their butts off in relative obscurity. (OW 2 big words my head hurts!) I never said the stones, I almost understand them. For the record the few I get.... Beatles, Stones, Zep, U2, and maybe The Who. They have always been above most others. It's almost like when they say Top 10 guitarists of all time. There are 100 top 10 guitarists. You'll always leave someone out. His style is different, he's the fastest etc. It's all opinion,just like this subject. WHAT YOU DON"T LIKE JEFF.......kidding!! Have a good one.

Because it's about the song. The song is the most important thing. Forget about guitars, forget about vocals. It's about the song. Aretha Franklin is just another good singer without songs like RESPECT and A Natural Woman. Hendrix is just another good guitarist without Purple Haze. The Stones are not the Stones if they don't write songs like Satisfaction and Sympathy For The Devil. You want to be considered a great musician? Write a great song and have it catch on. And then, if you're lucky, it will go past that initial adoration and become something timeless, like Satisfaction, Purple Haze, Sitting On The Dock Of The Bay, Superstition, Like A Rolling Stone, and Born To Run. For whatever reason, you can blame the record company, you can blame the trends, you can blame the fan taste, but that is the reason why. And it's just a matter of the right place at the right time. When Dylan came out with Like A Rolling Stone, when Hendrix came out with Purple Haze, when the Who came out with My Generation, when the Stones came out with Satisfaction, that was earth-shattering at the time. They completely redefined what music was and could be. And talk about lucky, if Hendrix had come out five years earlier or five years later with Purple Haze he would not have become as influential as he has. Five years earlier would've been too radical for anybody's tastes (think Buddy Guy). Five years later and he would've been too late as far as catching all that was going on 1967-1968. He still would've been popular, but not as earth-shattering as he was. And honestly, today, that's really hard to do, even for a guy like Joe. Because by now, it's all been done. All a guy like Joe can do is go out and play the kick-ass blues that he knows and try to change things up the best he can. And hope he comes across something that is truly original and new and turns the world on its head.

The key is to just do what you love, write what you write, and play what you play. Try to write and play the best music you can, and if you're lucky, you'll create something that is indeed timeless.

"And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make"

My ReverbNation page for Dees & Friends - check us out!
www.reverbnation.com/deesfriends

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

Very nice Deezer.  smile

I know that Joe could play one of those kid's guitars with the plastic strings and make it sound good-
Bill S.

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

Shredit wrote:
vickyh31 wrote:

I don't get Bruce Springsteen!

Ditto!!...makes me yawn

Dave

I took Shred to see Bruce last Nov., free tix, the only way I was goin'. We sat through the show with my friend Tari LaCourt, to keep her company since her hubby has to be on the main floor goin' nuts with his fellow east coasters. I just don't get it either, I think it's more of a regional thing since most people I know that are crazy about him have ties to back east. To each his own though I'm just sayin', I'm not judgin'.

                                                                                                            Think Green,

                                                                                                            J Dawg

What is success? Is it do yo' own thang, or is it to join the rest?   -Allen Toussaint

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

I can't let this Bruce dissing go by.

It's certainly not a 'back east' thing because he's always been HUGE in Europe. As there's no arguing with people's different tastes, I'm not going to try. Just a couple of points though.

I saw last year's tour, and as someone who has loved and admired Bruce (and the E. St. Band) since the early 70's, I was disappointed - not in the performance, but in the selection of songs. Nevertheless, there can surely be no doubt that Bruce (together with Dylan) are the two most important and influential American songwriters/poets/musical artists of the last four decades. Both have produced a catalog of songs that will remain classics forever. But there is one big difference between them - Bruce just oozes charisma, energy and stage presence.

Bruce and Bonnie, my boss and bossess. big_smile

RIP Iron Man

Rock On and keep the Faith

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

I've got your back here George. In the '70s I didn't watch TV or listen to the radio. So, I was bowled over one day in the airport when every magazine..Time, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, etc. had BRUCE on the cover. My friend and I were like "Bruce Who?". You can call it regional if you want, but those were national publications. Anyway, saw him soon after and it was one of the best concerts ever. The crowd was into it, rocked all night.
   I disagree about it being the song. It's not that simple. It's the sound..the sum total of the sound, for ME. I"ll take Joe's Sloe Gin over Tim Curry's anyday! But I will never assume that I have the right to decide what is good and what is bad to anybody but myself.
    Joe is one of those rare musicians. He will leave a footprint. He is a pioneer! AND would remind everybody to be respectful!   Cathy

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

Fretwork wrote:

Some of the "hair bands" in the late 80s early 90s--the ones who didn't survive when grunge started to get popular.

i think you are missing the point.  those were fads, not mega musicians

http://youtube.com/watch?v=fCdNsm7gvu8

If wine and pills were hundred dollar bills
I might keep you satisfied

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

cathysiler wrote:

I've got your back here George. In the '70s I didn't watch TV or listen to the radio. So, I was bowled over one day in the airport when every magazine..Time, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, etc. had BRUCE on the cover. My friend and I were like "Bruce Who?". You can call it regional if you want, but those were national publications. Anyway, saw him soon after and it was one of the best concerts ever. The crowd was into it, rocked all night.
   I disagree about it being the song. It's not that simple. It's the sound..the sum total of the sound, for ME. I"ll take Joe's Sloe Gin over Tim Curry's anyday! But I will never assume that I have the right to decide what is good and what is bad to anybody but myself.
    Joe is one of those rare musicians. He will leave a footprint. He is a pioneer! AND would remind everybody to be respectful!   Cathy

Told ya I'd piss someone off...hey just my opinion...dont be hattin on me!....I'm only the mailman, I can screw your mail up with one phone call to my homies  wink

Dave

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

cathysiler wrote:

I've got your back here George. In the '70s I didn't watch TV or listen to the radio. So, I was bowled over one day in the airport when every magazine..Time, Newsweek, Rolling Stone, etc. had BRUCE on the cover. My friend and I were like "Bruce Who?". You can call it regional if you want, but those were national publications. Anyway, saw him soon after and it was one of the best concerts ever. The crowd was into it, rocked all night.
   I disagree about it being the song. It's not that simple. It's the sound..the sum total of the sound, for ME. I"ll take Joe's Sloe Gin over Tim Curry's anyday! But I will never assume that I have the right to decide what is good and what is bad to anybody but myself.
    Joe is one of those rare musicians. He will leave a footprint. He is a pioneer! AND would remind everybody to be respectful!   Cathy

Of course, it is the sum total. But if we are to pick out the most important thing, the thing that I think stands out the most, it is the song. Because how many brilliant musicians have come and gone without a hit, while people who maybe couldn't play or sing as well (Dylan) have the timeless stuff. Because the songs that people like him write hit so many people on a personal level.

And then of course, you have guys like Hendrix, who not only wrote great songs, but put brilliant playing behind them. When you think about a top ten list of guitarists, it's usually guys who have some pretty stout material behind them. Page, Hendrix, Clapton, Gilmour, and Van Halen are all usually on some magazine's top 10 list. All brilliant players, but we could all come up with players who we thought deserve to stand alongside them. So what makes them stand out? The hits that they or their bands have.

And I believe that Joe has the potential to be in this league. And in my opinion, he has written things and performed songs that are indeed timeless, if put in front of the right audience. But Joe is playing an unfair game in today's mainstream music scene. It's just going to take and has taken longer.

"And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make"

My ReverbNation page for Dees & Friends - check us out!
www.reverbnation.com/deesfriends

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

i dont disagree at all that a HUGE part of any mega stars carerr is the ability to pen incredible songs.....where we differ is in the opinion of how great the songs dylan, the stones and bruce wrote.  obviously many people think they were great but to me i dont like the material hardly at all......there a handful of stones tunes that I can enjoy on occasion but i just dont like dylans or bruces tunes....they do nothing for me.

i also have never understood why the public embraces these types of artists as some of them are embarassing as singers or musicians....i mean when you hear dylan or jaggar sing its not good at all.....that doesnt jive with me......it's like going to a football game and 70,000 people are cheering for the 3rd string running back that averages 2.3 yards a carry and fumbles a couple times per game instead of the all-pro that can score every time you touch the ball.

in other words it seems to me that questionably talented musicans get alot of love while some fantastic folks remain unknown and struggle for public appreciation.

29 (edited by Deezer 2008-04-19 00:58:44)

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

A lot of times it has to do with how they get whatever they're trying to get across. One thing about Bruce, you cannot dig him all you want, but when he hits the stage, he gives it everything he has. I've seen videos of him performing when Born To Run came out all the way up through recently. He still gives it his all. And by his all, I mean jumping and running around, and singing Dancing In The Dark as if he wrote it yesterday. And his songs really do resonate with people because usually he's writing about things we can all relate with. There was a line I read about Hendrix's vocals, something along the lines of it wasn't a pretty voice, but instead it was a voice that had learned the lessons that the blues and Bob Dylan have to teach. It's like Howlin' Wolf, Howlin' Wolf by all technical standards was not a good singer, yet he is one of the greatest bluesmen of all time. It's about the heart you're trying to put out. If we only worried about good singers, then we might as well throw out guys like Howlin' Wolf, John Lee Hooker (who half the time just talked) and Jimmy Reed.

I choose not to look at this as a competition. By taking this viewpoint of, "How is so and so popular when this guy is not," that is essentially putting music into a competitive context. Music is not competitive. There is no mathematical formula that says that this music is better than this formula. Why is it that a guy like B.B. King is revered as a guitarist when he does not have near the range as say Steve Vai? If we were going by technical prowess, then yes, Vai is the better guitarist. But when the heart gets involved, there is no clear cut reason on why this guy should be better than this guy, or this guy should be a star.

And plenty of talented musicians over the years have gotten loads of accolades. Ray Charles, Stevie Wonder, Aretha Franklin, Hendrix, Clapton, Led Zeppelin, Prince, heck, even Carol King, have reached the top of their profession both critically and in popularity. I think where you are having a problem, is in today's music scene, where guys like Joe and Robert Randolph are taking a back seat to these bands on MTV and VH1. Although some extremely talented musicians like Norah Jones, Alicia Keys, and John Mayer have cracked through, many are not, and probably will not. This is more the product of how the record companies have taken over and are treating this more as a business. I guarantee you that today Stevie Wonder would not be anywhere near as popular as he was/is because his music and he himself cannot be pigeonholed into a neat little package to sell to corporate radio, VH1, and MTV. I'd say you probably need to take your quarrel about talented musicians being on the sideline up with these guys. In fact, there is a great documentary on the music industry called Before The Music Dies. It features musicians like Doyle Bramhall II and Erykah Badu. Very interesting and eye-opening look at the music industry, and it makes me glad that Joe has taken the path he has taken.

And you can disagree on the greatness of the songs written by Dylan and the Stones. What is impossible to disagree on is the impact that those songs have had. It goes beyond simple record sales. Those two bands/artists, combined with a few other bands, helped to define an era. You cannot like the music all you want, that's America in a heartbeat. But it is impossible to deny their impact on American and world music. That is true greatness that just cannot be touched.

"And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make"

My ReverbNation page for Dees & Friends - check us out!
www.reverbnation.com/deesfriends

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

Deezer wrote:

A lot of times it has to do with how they get whatever they're trying to get across. One thing about Bruce, you cannot dig him all you want, but when he hits the stage, he gives it everything he has. I've seen videos of him performing when Born To Run came out all the way up through recently. He still gives it his all. And by his all, I mean jumping and running around, and singing Dancing In The Dark as if he wrote it yesterday. And his songs really do resonate with people because usually he's writing about things we can all relate with. There was a line I read about Hendrix's vocals, something along the lines of it wasn't a pretty voice, but instead it was a voice that had learned the lessons that the blues and Bob Dylan have to teach. It's like Howlin' Wolf, Howlin' Wolf by all technical standards was not a good singer, yet he is one of the greatest bluesmen of all time. It's about the heart you're trying to put out. If we only worried about good singers, then we might as well throw out guys like Howlin' Wolf, John Lee Hooker (who half the time just talked) and Jimmy Reed.

I choose not to look at this as a competition. By taking this viewpoint of, "How is so and so popular when this guy is not," that is essentially putting music into a competitive context. Music is not competitive. There is no mathematical formula that says that this music is better than this formula. Why is it that a guy like B.B. King is revered as a guitarist when he does not have near the range as say Steve Vai? If we were going by technical prowess, then yes, Vai is the better guitarist. But when the heart gets involved, there is no clear cut reason on why this guy should be better than this guy, or this guy should be a star.

And plenty of talented musicians over the years have gotten loads of accolades. Ray Charles, Stevie Wonder, Aretha Franklin, Hendrix, Clapton, Led Zeppelin, Prince, heck, even Carol King, have reached the top of their profession both critically and in popularity. I think where you are having a problem, is in today's music scene, where guys like Joe and Robert Randolph are taking a back seat to these bands on MTV and VH1. Although some extremely talented musicians like Norah Jones, Alicia Keys, and John Mayer have cracked through, many are not, and probably will not. This is more the product of how the record companies have taken over and are treating this more as a business. I guarantee you that today Stevie Wonder would not be anywhere near as popular as he was/is because his music and he himself cannot be pigeonholed into a neat little package to sell to corporate radio, VH1, and MTV. I'd say you probably need to take your quarrel about talented musicians being on the sideline up with these guys. In fact, there is a great documentary on the music industry called Before The Music Dies. It features musicians like Doyle Bramhall II and Erykah Badu. Very interesting and eye-opening look at the music industry, and it makes me glad that Joe has taken the path he has taken.

And you can disagree on the greatness of the songs written by Dylan and the Stones. What is impossible to disagree on is the impact that those songs have had. It goes beyond simple record sales. Those two bands/artists, combined with a few other bands, helped to define an era. You cannot like the music all you want, that's America in a heartbeat. But it is impossible to deny their impact on American and world music. That is true greatness that just cannot be touched.

3 Dog Night became a Mega Group because of the songs Chuck (& others) picked to do.  You are Right on all counts Deezer.

Rock On & Keep the FAITH
             It is
Blues From the Bottoms

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

bigjeffjones wrote:

3 Dog Night became a Mega Group because of the songs Chuck (& others) picked to do.  You are Right on all counts Deezer.

3 Dog Night a Mega group? Not in my neck of the woods. I think we need to be careful about what/who we label as 'mega'.

RIP Iron Man

Rock On and keep the Faith

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

Hell I only said I didn't get Bruce Springteen not that I wanted him dead or anything!

Me and Dave and J Dawg too - i think we're in the doghouse or something! smile

From now on if it isn't a positive post i'm not posting! - is it hot in here?

Vicky

"Stellar" a word used by Joe Bonamassa (also apt as a description of the man himself cool)

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

suhl wrote:
Fretwork wrote:

Some of the "hair bands" in the late 80s early 90s--the ones who didn't survive when grunge started to get popular.

i think you are missing the point.  those were fads, not mega musicians

I absolutely missed the point!  I know some people who still think that these bands are "mega" though, does that count? wink

"There is nothing to it.  You only have to hit the right notes at the right time and the instrument plays itself."---Johann Sebastian Bach

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

It was the same thing with me,I don't personally HATE Dylan and Lou reed. This has been a pretty good POINT, COUNTER POINT. But really nobody is disagreeing on those artists place in musical history. I think FM radio hurt alot of those bands. It's like "I thought the stones and zep have more than 5 songs."  You have classic repeat radio,country repeat radio,top 40 repeat...............As far as the hair bands, I thought you meant that was one of the bands that you cranked up when you were alone! HA!  Obviously Deezer we don't know each other and great responses.......we do have one thing in common, STEVIE RAY VAUGHAN stood alone!!

"Is it the new blues mobile or what?"                                                                                                                                                                                                     "Fix the cigarette lighter."

35 (edited by Fretwork 2008-04-19 09:17:46)

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

Libby wrote:

Just a little something to throw into this discussion......

Last night we saw a woman named Laurie Morvan open for John Mayall.  This woman is smokin' hot.  She kicked some arse, for sure.  She told a story, about being interviewed a few years ago by the top 3 or 4 guitar magazines.  She had a GREAT time, she said, they all treated her very well.  But, when she told one of the interviewers that she hoped someday to be interviewed because she was going to be on the COVER of the magazine, she was told that THE only way a woman would EVER be on the cover would be if she were naked. 

She went on to tell us that AFTER she put her clothes back on....(Ha! Ha!  She's funny, too!).......anyway, you get my point.  There are even more hurdles for some artists - invisible hurdles.  This woman has GUTS and the fire and commitment to take her where she wants to go.  I don't doubt that she will be the first woman to grace that unnamed magazine's cover.  We loved her and will support her efforts.  SHE was GREAT!

http://www.lauriemorvan.com/lauriescorner.asp

smile  Libby  smile

P.S.  Original Dylan lyrics - the list is long and deep - I'll let y'all judge for yourselves .........

http://orad.dent.kyushu-u.ac.jp/dylan/song.html

Libby,
Thanks for the info on Laurie Morvan.  I've never heard of her before. 

I honestly hope she never gives the unnamed magazine the satisfaction of letting her be on the cover.  A woman of her caliber could start her own magazine and be on every cover!

"There is nothing to it.  You only have to hit the right notes at the right time and the instrument plays itself."---Johann Sebastian Bach

36 (edited by ohiodawg13 2008-04-19 10:16:41)

Re: They're a MEGA musician?!!

vickyh31 wrote:

Hell I only said I didn't get Bruce Springteen not that I wanted him dead or anything!

Me and Dave and J Dawg too - i think we're in the doghouse or something! smile

From now on if it isn't a positive post i'm not posting! - is it hot in here?

Vicky

Vicky, don't be afraid to speak from the heart here. These are just opinions and there's no need to shy away. I'm sure that I can speak for Shred as well as myself that what we think of Springsteen and anybodies reaction to that is just a grain of sand on the entire beach in relation to what's going on in both our lives in the past year. Honestly, I would have scalped the tix for that show, but I didn't want to hurt anybodies feelings. At face value I could have paid for an overnight road trip to see Joe play.

                                                                                        Say What You Mean And
                                                                                        Mean What You Say,

                                                                                        J Dawg

What is success? Is it do yo' own thang, or is it to join the rest?   -Allen Toussaint