Topic: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

01. Hold On - Alabama Shakes
02. We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together - Taylor Swift
03. Take a Walk - Passion Pit
04. Thinkin' 'Bout You - Frank Ocean
05. Ramada Inn - Neil Young and Crazy Horse
06. Mercy - Kanye Inn Featuring Big Sean, Pusha T and 2 Chainz
07. Rock Ground - Bruce Springsteen
08. Sixteen Saltines - Jack White
09. Pay in Blood - Bob Dylan
10. Emmylou - First Aid Kit
16. Stay Frosty - Van Halen
18. Doom and Gloom - Rolling Stones
20. Going Home - Leonard Cohen
21. Weather in My Head - Donald Fagan
23. I'm Dreaming - Randy Newman
30. That's Why God Made the Radio - Beach Boys
32. We Take Care of Our Own - Bruce Springsteen
39. A Heart Like Mine - Dwight Yoakam
To see the whole list, go to Rolling Stone.
http://www.rollingstone.com/music/lists … 2-20121205

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

All I can say is that this list leaves me severely broken

Your rock candy baby
Your hard sweet and sticky

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

gary wrote:

All I can say is that this list leaves me severely broken

These people are obviously living in an alternate universe - one totally devoid of real music.  Just proves once again how irrelevant this magazine has become.

Sandy

"There's a lot of people that are in so much of a hurry to be, I guess, to be famous or that they don't want to take the time to learn to play and do all that.They'd rather just knock it down off a computer and maybe get on a game show and get famous..That's fine if that's what you want to do.
"We're more old school than that. We like creating the sounds."  - Tom Petty

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

Really, those are top songs of 2012.....really

Women, whiskey and miles of travelin' is all I understand

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

Hahaha...gave me the best laugh of the day. Thanks.
They picked the worst VH song off the latest album?!

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

Yawn.... :bhw

Come on the Blades (sorry Idolbone just had to borrow your line)

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

My sister literally LOL at this list. Some few decent songs there.
We like Doom & Gloom and just that....it's all we like..

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

scorpion-70 wrote:

Really, those are top songs of 2012.....really

Justin Beiber nuff said

Your rock candy baby
Your hard sweet and sticky

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

A majority of this list highlights the difference between Music and ($)Entertainment-in-audio-product-form($).

Music is an Art, whereas most of the songs on mainstream airplay these days are the equivalent of fast food for the ears, just pure instant gratification, but no fulfilling value, just empty calories that are cheap to make/replicate and make a fortune for those selling them.
Thats not to say there's anything wrong with listening to them and enjoying them for what they are (entertainment), but to support/promote and evangelize it as music to look up to and emulate for artistic reasons is something i have little patience for, and sadly that is what Rolling Stone magazine does constantly.

There's always exceptions to the rule but it all comes down to what you value as a music fan, music made with integrity and honest intent, or songs that adhere to a consumer-conscious formula (4 minutes, vocals start before 20 seconds, verse, chorus, verse, chorus, key change, simple lyrics & melodies to stick in the listeners head, tweaked to death at the mixing desk & auto-tune for the pretty female singer with the boob-job, all other instruments replicated by pro-tools or played by successful session musicians, add in computer generated handclaps and a bridge section filled by a current rapper and you've got a hit etc etc...) that have a huge dollar-sign hanging over them, because frankly thats all they are, a product and nothing else.

Also any publication that does top 10/20/50/100 lists of anything in the Arts (in a way that implies there is a way to decipher the merit of any given example to the point that you can insinuate its value in comparison to others of its kind) is looking to sell magazines to the gullible or uninitiated and nothing more.
Anyway, you honestly think that 5 or 6 writers/reviewers got in a room and listened to all the songs that came out this year and painstakingly judged the best songs through some secret formula that assigns value to such tunes just so they can inform their loyal readership?

Common sense gets lost sometimes in todays 'I'm offended by that' society

Me playing Joe's actual Ibanez Tubescreamer pedal - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76jk58_vl2s

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

frazerburns19 wrote:

A majority of this list highlights the difference between Music and ($)Entertainment-in-audio-product-form($).

Music is an Art, whereas most of the songs on mainstream airplay these days are the equivalent of fast food for the ears, just pure instant gratification, but no fulfilling value, just empty calories that are cheap to make/replicate and make a fortune for those selling them.
Thats not to say there's anything wrong with listening to them and enjoying them for what they are (entertainment), but to support/promote and evangelize it as music to look up to and emulate for artistic reasons is something i have little patience for, and sadly that is what Rolling Stone magazine does constantly.

There's always exceptions to the rule but it all comes down to what you value as a music fan, music made with integrity and honest intent, or songs that adhere to a consumer-conscious formula (4 minutes, vocals start before 20 seconds, verse, chorus, verse, chorus, key change, simple lyrics & melodies to stick in the listeners head, tweaked to death at the mixing desk & auto-tune for the pretty female singer with the boob-job, all other instruments replicated by pro-tools or played by successful session musicians, add in computer generated handclaps and a bridge section filled by a current rapper and you've got a hit etc etc...) that have a huge dollar-sign hanging over them, because frankly thats all they are, a product and nothing else.

Also any publication that does top 10/20/50/100 lists of anything in the Arts (in a way that implies there is a way to decipher the merit of any given example to the point that you can insinuate its value in comparison to others of its kind) is looking to sell magazines to the gullible or uninitiated and nothing more.
Anyway, you honestly think that 5 or 6 writers/reviewers got in a room and listened to all the songs that came out this year and painstakingly judged the best songs through some secret formula that assigns value to such tunes just so they can inform their loyal readership?

Common sense gets lost sometimes in todays 'I'm offended by that' society

Do you pay attention to that glossy fishwrap?

Free download from Vienna! http://mbsy.co/bNLR
Lots of unique videos of Joe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwd5vL8fXTw
Buy Joe's merchandise here. http://www.jbonamassa.com/affiliates/id … hp?id=1381

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

Nope. Which will explain any assumptions or misrepresentations i may have made. Im only going on what i've seen from their constant 'top 20' lists i've seen mentioned on forums

Me playing Joe's actual Ibanez Tubescreamer pedal - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76jk58_vl2s

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

This topic has had many discussions in the past. Joe took pride in NOT being mentioned in RS until recently when they had to begrudgingly give a mention due to his release hitting tops on Billboard. Just another inane list, designed to satisfy the advertisers and clients. Your points are all quite valid.
Rick

Free download from Vienna! http://mbsy.co/bNLR
Lots of unique videos of Joe http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwd5vL8fXTw
Buy Joe's merchandise here. http://www.jbonamassa.com/affiliates/id … hp?id=1381

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

RickB wrote:

This topic has had many discussions in the past. Joe took pride in NOT being mentioned in RS until recently when they had to begrudgingly give a mention due to his release hitting tops on Billboard. Just another inane list, designed to satisfy the advertisers and clients. Your points are all quite valid.
Rick

Thanks Rick, i appreciate that.

Was expecting folk to just respond flippantly & tell me to lighten up so cheers my good man

Me playing Joe's actual Ibanez Tubescreamer pedal - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76jk58_vl2s

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

I read RS religiously when it was non-glossy fishwrap based in San Francisco, but haven't paid much attention since Ben Fong-Torres left.

                                                                                      Merry Xmas Damnit!!!

                                                                                      J Dawg

What is success? Is it do yo' own thang, or is it to join the rest?   -Allen Toussaint

15 (edited by Rocket 2012-12-09 12:23:58)

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

frazerburns19 wrote:

A majority of this list highlights the difference between Music and ($)Entertainment-in-audio-product-form($).

Music is an Art, whereas most of the songs on mainstream airplay these days are the equivalent of fast food for the ears, just pure instant gratification, but no fulfilling value, just empty calories that are cheap to make/replicate and make a fortune for those selling them.
Thats not to say there's anything wrong with listening to them and enjoying them for what they are (entertainment), but to support/promote and evangelize it as music to look up to and emulate for artistic reasons is something i have little patience for, and sadly that is what Rolling Stone magazine does constantly.

There's always exceptions to the rule but it all comes down to what you value as a music fan, music made with integrity and honest intent, or songs that adhere to a consumer-conscious formula (4 minutes, vocals start before 20 seconds, verse, chorus, verse, chorus, key change, simple lyrics & melodies to stick in the listeners head, tweaked to death at the mixing desk & auto-tune for the pretty female singer with the boob-job, all other instruments replicated by pro-tools or played by successful session musicians, add in computer generated handclaps and a bridge section filled by a current rapper and you've got a hit etc etc...) that have a huge dollar-sign hanging over them, because frankly thats all they are, a product and nothing else.

Also any publication that does top 10/20/50/100 lists of anything in the Arts (in a way that implies there is a way to decipher the merit of any given example to the point that you can insinuate its value in comparison to others of its kind) is looking to sell magazines to the gullible or uninitiated and nothing more.
Anyway, you honestly think that 5 or 6 writers/reviewers got in a room and listened to all the songs that came out this year and painstakingly judged the best songs through some secret formula that assigns value to such tunes just so they can inform their loyal readership?

Common sense gets lost sometimes in todays 'I'm offended by that' society

^
Extremely succinct post my good man!  Beautiful.  Spot ON as you say.  Definitely one of the top 5 JB forum succinct posts of the year!!! wink   big_smile

Rock Solid ON & Keep the Faith,
Rocket

"He still doesn't charge for mistakes! wink"
http://jbonamassa.com/tour-dates/
"Everybody wants ta get inta the act!"
“Now, this isn’t your ordinary party crowd, here.  I mean, there are professionals in here.”

Re: Rolling Stone's Top 50 Songs of 2012

Thank you Rocket thats a hell of a compliment sir wink

Me playing Joe's actual Ibanez Tubescreamer pedal - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76jk58_vl2s