Re: BCC/ Joe B/Musicradar Interview
Well, first off I think the statement by Joe is very good. Nothing to regret about it in any way.
He's felt 'under the gun' by Glenns comments since the summer and needed to set the record straight. Glenns tactic has been all wrong on this, but maybe it has been 'lead singer syndrome'.
Some of the posters here have their own personal dislike of Glenns vocals, but frankly, within the concept of this band, which is totally different to Joe's day job, they were/are perfectly in order. Thankfully, he even toned them down for BCC! So those people with a dislike of that were never going to 'get' BCC, and that is perfectly fine.
I'm one of those from the other camp, and find it has been some of Joe's best work. I think they were/are a great band. Speaking purely personally it wasn't necessary for me for BCC to tour anyway. I just love the recorded work and its dynamic. However, from a business aspect, I don't think the band could afford to create the albums endlessly without touring them....or could they? I don't know what the business model was intended to be for BCC.
In this day and age, artists earn their real money from performing, don't they? or have I got it wrong? OK, they did the albums real quick and maybe that saved some cash, but these 4 guys and Kevin Shirley don't do it for nothing do they?
I'm going to enjoy 'Afterglow', as I would have enjoyed its successor. The first 2 albums remain on constant play on my systems as will the latest offering. Touring? I would have supported it, but I don't need to see them, but I would have expected that they, the band, would need to do it to continue paying for the studio time and production costs.
In an earlier interview Joe gave the green light for another guitarist to be used for extended live touring and I for one thought this would be a logical solution to the problem. Strangely though, part of Glenn's tactic was to refuse this possibility. I would have supported the tour with my gate money to see the band minus Joe, in the hope that the maintained interest would continue to see him playing, recording and writing with the band when his own personal committments allowed.
I think respective managements could have and maybe should have nipped this in the bud. Jason's frustrations hint at a failure to reassure and definitively state what this 'project' was so that the band members knew exactly where they stood. But thats easy to say from where I am sat.
Still, it is now, what it is. I'll treasure the music already made. Joe is a class act and I think he has behaved very honourably throughout the saga, only now coming out to set the record straight and doing so in his typically frank and honest way. I'll genuinely be surprised if Glenn allows the potential of BCC to pass but you never know. Maybe even he really knows that it was Joe's star that gave this project the 'twinkle' it needed and without him it won't work. He has said as much.
I'm for the music at the end of the day. I loved 1, adore 2 and if an afterglow is all I am left with then I'll bask in it whatever.