Topic: Fender Going Public
IPO estiamtes of $13 - $15 per share.
Will you buy?
The official forum for all things Joe Bonamassa, guitars and blues music
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Joe Bonamassa Forum → Joe's Guitars, Amps and Gear → Fender Going Public
IPO estiamtes of $13 - $15 per share.
Will you buy?
Hmmm.....shares in Fender or a Gibson Les Paul....I know which is the safer investment!!
This would be a novelty Christmas gift. Not sure if I'd buy 100's of shares though.
Too bad they don't issue stock certificates any more. So what's the point?
So what's the point?
Buy low, sell high, retire early
Might as well give it a shot.....your cash ain't worth squat in the bank these days....buy vintage guitars instead...:)
IPO was yanked. Weakened demand. Facebook put a pall over the market.
IPO was yanked. Weakened demand. Facebook put a pall over the market.
And it's a good thing. Once you let the public in, the ONLY thing that matters is making money. How do you make money????? By lowering costs. How do you lower costs????? Higher inexperienced workers AND use inferior quality material. Net effect= shitty product.
I was very happy to see this not happen.
twelvenotes wrote:IPO was yanked. Weakened demand. Facebook put a pall over the market.
And it's a good thing. Once you let the public in, the ONLY thing that matters is making money. How do you make money????? By lowering costs. How do you lower costs????? Higher inexperienced workers AND use inferior quality material. Net effect= shitty product.
And when that happens, sales drop, profits drop and the board of directors, who typically own a bunch of the stock, get really upset and install a mangement team to improve product quality, sales & profits.
I've seen well run public companies and poorly run public companies.
At $15, I probably would have taken a chance and bought some
How do you make money????? By lowering costs. How do you lower costs????? Higher inexperienced workers AND use inferior quality material. Net effect= shitty product.
or... you get rid of a layer of management flatten the management structure and become more accountable to your workforce and customers, - invest in training your workforce thereby increasing the skill of your workers, so that they stay with the company as they now have a career; improving output and therefore profit.. Net effect= improved product. - Sorry to disagree with you there but there is more than one way to skin a cat. Fender already make cheep product largely I suspect through outsourcing to factories that they do not own, - they have a volume product group with Squire so I suspect that public investment could result in better product. Of course I accept what you say a seeing a downside of a lot of companies who g public but recent employment has led me to believe that there are a lot of private (limited) companies run by idiots...
I'll chip in that the current state of not being able to forecast employee health costs for US co's has plenty sitting on the sideline with cash waiting for the elections. There is no way to calculate a bottom line with any certainty right now if you are a co. with more than 50 employees unless you want to alienate all of them by opting out, paying the fine and dumping the lot into the open market. If this is too political, please just ignore the facts. For an IPO to work, there has to be a way to calculate P/E for investors to set a price. I see this as the private equity owners cashing out and running with the money while the co. still has value. It has no bearing on quality of product.
Rick
Joe Bonamassa Forum → Joe's Guitars, Amps and Gear → Fender Going Public
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
Currently installed 2 official extensions. Copyright © 2003–2009 PunBB.