Re: New Epiphones starting to appear?
I might be wrong but the assumption that these broken necks are from impact damage must surely be wrong? Having so many must be due to manufacturing failure, that headstock is not connected to that neck right surely?
Nobody likes a SA, so sorry for this but I just would not buy a guitar without seeing and playing it, which is probably why I will never have a Joe signature model as there are too many people who will order up-front without playing the thing. And that goes for Gibson as well as Epiphone (and Fender), - there appears to be be too much variance in quality.
I think that the Epi range was a toe in the water testing market reaction before launching a £1000 Gibson which has now happened. But again i have read too many message-board posts about varying Gibson quality control to pay before play. Sorry to be glass half empty on this.
Hi Ian,
I understand what you are saying about a manufacturing failure, the problem is that the Les Paul has an inherent design floor in the neck/headstock area, that's why if you breathe to heavilly on a Les Paul the neck can break. There is no connection between the neck and the headstock it's all carved from one piece of Mahogany.
Now, bearing in mind how fragile a Les Paul neck is to begin with, ship it in a low quality case (without adequate packing and also with the strings tuned to playing pitch) and you have a recipe for disaster.
I have just heard from a guitar salesman at PMT who has spoken to Gibson QC in Europe and he has been told that there is an issue with the quality of the cases that are being shipped with the Epi JB inside them, this could account for the seemingly high number of breakages. I would be interested to know if the guys that have recieved theirs already noticed whether the guitar was pretty much tuned. The strings should be substantially de-tuned prior to shipping to reduce the pressure on the neck during transit.
