Topic: Marshall Vintage Modern

Hey Gearheads....

for anyone with experience with the Marshall VM, i have a few questions for you....

I am looking at a couple of 50 watt heads and combos in my price range and I wanted to get some of your thought....

1)  which do you prefer head or combo?
2) if head, what speaker combination would you recommend to get a real good bluesy tone but still have the cleaner tone for doing some jazzier type of stuff?
3) can the VM be used to do some smooth jazz work?
4) has anyone seen a black version instead of purple?..color doesn't matter just asking


Barry

2009 Gibson Les Paul 1958 VOS (with black plastic)
2008 Gibson Les Paul Traditional Goldtop (with the cream plastic from the 58RI)
> Marshall Bluesbreaker 2 pedal >Boss sd-1> DD3 > Vox Ac15cc1

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

Hi Barry,

I ran the 50 watt VM2266 through some of it's paces at a buddies house last month.  He's kind of particular so I didn't twist too many knobs.  He said it took him a while to dial it in (that may be a clue).  It's a cool amp, I just couldn't justify the price ($1300 @ Sweetwater for the head).  I went with a used (mint) DSL 100 head and 1936 cab for right around $1000 bucks total and couldn't be happier.  I basically use just channel one on crunch but there are some great tones on channel two as well.  Someone correct me if I am wrong, I was hesitant to pull the trigger on a 100 watt, but I don't think the volume is THAT much different.  (maybe 10db I'm guessing - I haven't ever A/B the two at the same time)  If you go for the VM, I would definitely NOT go with the combo.  My buddy has a Mesa Lonestar combo and that thing is a pig.  It's much easier to make the two trips and save your back IMHO.  Let us know what you get!

LesPaul4 wrote:

Hey Gearheads....

for anyone with experience with the Marshall VM, i have a few questions for you....

I am looking at a couple of 50 watt heads and combos in my price range and I wanted to get some of your thought....

1)  which do you prefer head or combo?
2) if head, what speaker combination would you recommend to get a real good bluesy tone but still have the cleaner tone for doing some jazzier type of stuff?
3) can the VM be used to do some smooth jazz work?
4) has anyone seen a black version instead of purple?..color doesn't matter just asking


Barry

3 (edited by tmcguire 2010-05-03 21:38:35)

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

I have a 2266 and for me and what I like to play (blues, blues/rock, and some jazz) it is perfect. I took a long time and played every Marshall made and some that are not made anymore such as the JCM 900, and this is the one that I liked the best. It may be the KT66 power tubes, or who knows what; but this is one I won't be trading in.

Tom

PS - mine is the black version - though if you look closely you can see purple in it; but it is not the bright purple.

#275 JB LP

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

The only experience I have with it was when a salesman was trying to sell me a Gibson Firebird V.  He asked what flavor you want and I said its a Gibson so lets do a Marshall.  He wanted to hook me up to a DSL 2000 or something like that but I saw the purple thought anybody that was man enough to own a purple cab has to be a great guitar player so I asked  to play through it.  He kept the volume low at first and after he saw that I had played guitar once or twice before just cranked open the volume.  I must say I have never in my life played as loud as that guy had me cranked up.  All I can say is the amp had the bottom end covered.  It was pulling off 60's Clapton Cream stuff no problem.  Roll the guitar volume down and it would clean up enough that it was still ballsy but not quite as distorted.  I had a JCM 800 and that thing rocked but it was far too bright.  I loved this amp, and later I bought the old Peavy Windsor head with KT66 tubes and I thought for the money the Peavy sound very close for a fraction of the cost of the Marshall.  It just didn't have as nice of features.  The Peavy Windsor was great for getting a Duane Allman type sound with a Les Paul.  Not like new marshalls where all they have is power and saturation I'm talking a thick ballsy clear sound that compressed when you hit the notes harder.  The VM did the same thing for me only I couldn't afford it.

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

I'm starting to learn that not all Marshalls are created equal, and some people get fooled (placebo?)
So I'd try playing before you buy.  hmm

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

I believe that the black-colored VM are the only ones being shipped to the states now.

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

I think I spotted the purple VM's mother!  lol
http://www.gunandgame.com/forums/attach … -drunk.jpg

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

big_smile  lol  lol  lol

2009 Gibson Les Paul 1958 VOS (with black plastic)
2008 Gibson Les Paul Traditional Goldtop (with the cream plastic from the 58RI)
> Marshall Bluesbreaker 2 pedal >Boss sd-1> DD3 > Vox Ac15cc1

Re: Marshall Vintage Modern

The Combo is sweet sounding.  50 watts is not any quieter than 100, but as Joe loves to point out you dont have the clean head room. 

I would always try before you buy, but if cost is not that big of a deal I'd check out the Combo and if it doesnt work for you try the 100 watt head. You have more options for speakers if you buy the head... 4x12 2x12 1x12 whatever...