Topic: bad news for gibson...

According to business insider, Gibson is the 13th most hated company in the United States....

" Gibson Guitar is the lowest rated company on the Glassdoor list. Gibson is privately held. The firm is based in Nashville. Gibson got into financial trouble in the early 1980s and was rescued by a group of investors in 1986. Gibson had several layoffs that cut its workforce by about 20% by mid-2009. There have been a number of complaints about the quality of the company’s products recently. In November, it was revealed that Gibson was being investigated for violating the Lacey Act, a key piece of environmental law, for importing endangered species of rosewood from Madagascar. The alleged violation has gone over poorly with Gibson customers and may hurt sales."

As for me, I would much rather buy an older/used LP than shell out the cash for an outragously expensive brand new one. Either that, or I would rather find a custom builder who could build EXACTLY what I want for probably about the same price or less (I'm getting a korina v for $2,000. Gibson charges $12,000 for the same thing) I am getting over paying for the name.

Logan

Block inlay Gibson ES-335, 50th anniversary American Strat, '61 RI White SG, '62 RI Relic Strat, Replica Korina Flying V, Gold Tone Paul Beard Resonator,  '58 Les Paul RI, American Highway 1 Fender Strat, Breedlove Acoustic, Stonetree Joe Bonamassa Custom, HIWATT Lead 100R, Reeves Custom 30.

Re: bad news for gibson...

I bleed Gibson (no joke I'd get a Gibson tat tongue ) - I see no problems in their quality - any company has their lemons.  Yes I think the prices are high, but you really are getting what you pay for... a Gibson.  There is a reason they have been around as long as they have.  I'd like to know where these complaints are comming from - people who buy from an online source without seeing/playing the guitar.... it might look good on the screen, but if you play it might not be for you, and the next person that comes along might say wow you hate this, this is the best 59 I've played   OR   is people complaining of the prices because they can't shell out the cash so they are giving them the "screw them" complaint... of course its not free, save your lunch money like everyone else.

I need more information to justify why they are the 13th most hated company and the reasoning for the complaints.

Ben

Re: bad news for gibson...

Don't get me wrong, I love Gibson. I love my r8 and I hope to get several more gibsons over time. I'm just posting the info. I do think that somethings are a bit silly though. I don't think I would personally ever use a robot guitar or the dark fire or the crazy tiger or whatever the he'll it is haha. But they are just a company trying to keep up with current technology.



Logan

Block inlay Gibson ES-335, 50th anniversary American Strat, '61 RI White SG, '62 RI Relic Strat, Replica Korina Flying V, Gold Tone Paul Beard Resonator,  '58 Les Paul RI, American Highway 1 Fender Strat, Breedlove Acoustic, Stonetree Joe Bonamassa Custom, HIWATT Lead 100R, Reeves Custom 30.

Re: bad news for gibson...

I HATE Gibson right now.
Their prices are insane, and they keep releasing awful designs!

I do have a Gibson, which I love, but I got it when the prices were good. Not £1799 for a standard!
I just wish they would get their act together.

I'm going to start looking at different brands other than gibson and fender, there are hundreds out there that are better for far less money.

Re: bad news for gibson...

Let us know what you find. I have been looking up custom lutihers. Found a few, already ordered from one. I have also been on a warmoth.com kick for a little while now.


Logan

Block inlay Gibson ES-335, 50th anniversary American Strat, '61 RI White SG, '62 RI Relic Strat, Replica Korina Flying V, Gold Tone Paul Beard Resonator,  '58 Les Paul RI, American Highway 1 Fender Strat, Breedlove Acoustic, Stonetree Joe Bonamassa Custom, HIWATT Lead 100R, Reeves Custom 30.

Re: bad news for gibson...

I can vouch for the Agile's over at http://www.rondomusic.com/electricguitar.html My first real guitar was something similar to their "Agile Hawker Blue Flame". Really exactly that, but in a slightly different color they dont carry any more. Love that guitar, possibly even more than my Strat yikes

Guitars - Cheapo "Jay Turser"
A beautiful Blue guitar made by "Agile"
2009 Fender American Standard Stratocaster - Olympic White, Maple Wood Fretboard
1994 Blue Gibson Les Paul Studio Lite, Black-Chrome Hardware

Re: bad news for gibson...

To be honest I would rather buy a japanese copy, takai/edwards etc. I own a tokai love rock and it is a great guitar. Is a gibson 4 times better (paid £450 for mine used) I don't think so. I played one of the new standards a was not keen on it at all, couldn't quite put my finger on it.

Re: bad news for gibson...

Agiles are just great. I own two ( AL3100s ) and they kick serious butt. I also have a Gibson Les Paul and while it was about 4 times as expansive as the Agiles, it's not really better by any means. It's just as good albeit merely slightly different. I love Gibsons, and they're usually great guitars ( even though their craftsmanship quality had taken a plunge in the last few years it seems to be back on track now ).

I find really cool that is you really want that vintage Gibson/Marshall tone you can get it by buying stuff that sports none of those brand logos or paying huge dollar for designs that shouldn't really cost that much. Personally I don't really give a rat's **** about what's on the headstock of the guitar I'm playing, but the tone coming out of the speakers is really important and knowing what I'm looking for sometimes copies get me there faster and cheaper than the so called "original"...

Re: bad news for gibson...

I asked a local guitar dealer why he didn't sale PRS, Fender or Gibson.  He responded "because they are over priced crap!"  He sales Sheckter, Dean, and other china maded guitars.  He said "the biggest difference today with these guitars and the american guitars is the parts such as pots and pickups.  By the time you upgrade those you've got guitars with cheaper wood, but better quality control and usually play better out of the box then anything else sold today."  Most Sheckter guitars come stock with Grover tuners and Tone Pro brides now and Seymour Duncan pickups.  Just yesterday I saw musicians Friends stupid deal of the day was an $800 sheckter for $499. 

I'm a Gibson fan.  I've owned 7 high end Gibsons over the last 10 years, but when you got companies such as these that are offering aftermarket parts STOCK on their guitars and they play as good as anything out there for a fraction of the cost why would you want to spend the extra cash?  Dean makes guitar that I think are as good looking as Gibson, Sheckter has a few wild designs I would try maybe not as pretty as a Gibson but a heck of a lot of bang for the buck.

As far as Gibsons quality goes my dad got a Les paul Traditional Pro a while back.  I noticed some flaws on it such as the binding in a certain place doesn't cover all the maple cap where it meets the back of the guitar but its just little things like that.  But the guitar itself is a monster!  Best playing Gibson I've ever played with those plek frets and those locking tuners.  Sure wish they would go back to ABR-1 Bridges I like the one on my classic better then the Nashvill bridge. 

So I guess it all depends on your what your after to me Gibson and PRS are over priced but they also look the best out of just about everything in the world.  They might have used to have an advantage in sound, quality, and playability in the past but the world is catching up to this soon who knows solid maple tops will be offered with these cheaper china made guitar.  I used to be all about Made in America until I bought a few Yamaha guitrs. I had a AES620, RGX-TT (Ty Tabor Signature model) and an acoustic FS720S that I got for $200 played better then my 000-18 C.F. Martin and sounded better too.  It wasn't as loud but the sound was sweeter. 

So I say bad news for American Guitar.  A friend of mine told me guitars are follow suit of the Car industry.  Guitars popularity has been in the last 15 years a prime example of that is the 59' Les Paul.  10 years ago you could buy one for the ball park of $60,000.  Now they are going for $350,000 or more depending on the rarity.  Guitar sales are at a all time record high and as bad as Gibson may be doing they are having record sales in last 10 years.  But my friend claims that guitar industry is about 20 years behind the Car industry and have followed just about every trend to a tee.  Whats that mean?  Look at Ford, Chevy, or Dodge.  They have huge bail out money and still can't sale their cars at cheaper prices then imports.  It doesn't take an expert to know that if you can get something for less thats what is going to be selling.  Gibson, Fender, and PRS are in no way going to shut down any time soon or ever for that matter but as time goes on they are going to cut something.  Don't know if its quality, prices, or both but they can't go on forever with these mark ups.

Re: bad news for gibson...

I still regret passing up an Edwards gold top and I'm still waiting on finding another Edwards / Greco I really couldnt justify £1500+ on a guitar that would be second choice to my strats. Though I dunno if you guys have noticed - do a search on google Epiphone Standard Les Paul Tribute http://www.dawsons.co.uk/acatalog/info_1_00067658.html and the 1959 http://www.guitarampkeyboard.com/en/83013 they both seem to be great value for money...

Re: bad news for gibson...

Alright I have a tendency to offend people so please dont take anything personally if I quote you...

I absolutely agree with GotMule.  Everything he said is dead on. 

As far as differenced between Companies like epiphone and gibson. 

I started playing guitar on an Epiphone Les Paul Standard.  I exchanged everything on that guitar except for the wood.  Every wire, hardware, pickups are seth lovers, volume knob and tone knobs are all high quality stuff.  I love that guitar.
It is a peice of crap compared to my 2007 R8.  Its in the wood.  I dont know if burstbucker pickups are better than set lovers or whatever. 

My epiphone does nothing for me compared to my gibson.  Oh... I thought I should mention I bought my R8 online from a guy in NYC.  I live in MD so I had to drive up to get it.  I didnt get a chance to play it until I got home.  It sounded amazing.

I have played R8's, R9's, R7's, R0's, 335's, 339's, SG's all at guitar center and various other shops. Some were set up and some not the way I like.  Bottom line,  I could pick up any of them and play them with no difficulty any show any time any place. 
If I came to a gig and my guitar broke and someone came up to me with a trashed Gibson I'd take it and play it and have no issues playing like I normally do.

If you look at how much a gibson Les Paul cost in 1959... 260 dollars i think. Then multiply by 10 which is a pretty close gauge for cost of living increases across the board.   Guess what you get...2600.  About the cost of a Gibson Les Paul.  Amazing.

Bottom Line.  I love Gibson guitars. They are making great stuff. Their Les Pauls are as good if not better then ever.  They are consistantly good sounding and playing. The old Les Pauls are very inconsistant per the owners on the Les Paul Forum. The new ones are good enough I would feel comfortable ordering one from any store in america and trust its going to sound and play good.

I think we get way to picky sometimes. Like if the neck doesnt meet our likeing then it must be gibsons fault for not making the neck right. I am willing to bet most issues with tone that we face are related to amps, pedals, and chords.

Also strings are an enormous factor in stores.  Some never put new strings on the guitars so they sound dead. Its not gibsons fault that the guitar sounds dead if the store doesnt get the strings right.

Any how I have an great deal of respect for all you guys and gals here. I have learned lots about all kinds of tones things here.

If you dont like Gibson then dont buy them.

Re: bad news for gibson...

Logo33 wrote:

Let us know what you find. I have been looking up custom lutihers. Found a few, already ordered from one. I have also been on a warmoth.com kick for a little while now.


Logan

Well, I'm getting that strat body through from RelicGuitarStudio any day now. I'll let you lot know how it is. If it's any good, I'm saving to get a tele built!
£220 for a body! It's good value I reckon, you can get the exact set up you want in terms of pickups, pots, neck size, fretboard radius, bridge...you know the rest.
Plus, the relic work looks incredible!

Re: bad news for gibson...

Jimi_lp wrote:

RelicGuitarStudio

I'd be interested in your feedback from dealing with then and about the body when you've had time to play with it. It's a lot cheaper than importing a body from Warmouth for instance for us UK dwellers.

There are 10 kinds of people who understand binary.
Those who do and those who do not.

Re: bad news for gibson...

Interesting conversation. I think just because you make a good product, you may not be a good company. The place I work provides excellent Heathcare; but they are a **## to work for.

For many years the 2 "music" stores here in Missoula (pop of about 60k) off and on tried to carry Gibson; but, according to them, they were required to carry too many models that didn't sell in order to sell guitars like Les Pauls. About 4  years ago, a new guitar store opened and the guy who owns it used to work for Gibson, and he, at first only carried Gibson and Epiphone and has done well. I have had occcasion to meet some of the Gibson reps here and I have found them to be very helpful and actually quite proud of their company.

I also know an employee at the Gibson accoustic factory in Bozeman, MT, and he wouldn't trade his job for the world.

Lastly, as a Gibson owner, I love the product and it is without doubt, my instrument of choice. The price for a new LP here in the states is comparable to PRS. I have both, and I feel the Gibson is a superior product.

Tom

#275 JB LP

Re: bad news for gibson...

in 30 years, todays Gibsons will be worth as much as the 70's gibsons are today. and nobody ever like the 70's Gibsons back in the day. Much to do about nothing. neutral

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

Re: bad news for gibson...

Add me to the list of people who despise Gibson and their current business dealings and decisions.

They have turned into the equivalent of what EMI, WB et al are.

It's nothing to do with music or tone any more. sad

Re: bad news for gibson...

Better play 10 Les Pauls of the same model to find maybe 2 or 3 that are good - common knowledge folks, shouldn't be that way for a $3-5k guitar - should only require a set up for action by you or your tech.

Re: bad news for gibson...

A few months ago I purchased a Dean Soltero - basically a Les Paul copy with mohogany body and neck, carved maple top, etc. It is a beautiful guitar and plays great. The only thing I am not 100% happy with are the pickups, not that they are crap, They are just not what I prefer so I will probably change them. I've never played one of the newer Gibsons because I simply cannot afford to buy one. The Dean was about $800 and to me is a great substitute for a Gibson. Nothing wrong with buying a Gibson if you have the bucks and nothing wrong with buying another brand if you don't. I can't imagine that the new Gibsons are that much better in quality than my Dean is because the Dean is top notch. The most important thing is how it feels to you and how it sounds to you because in the end you are the one who is going to play it and hear it the most.