Topic: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

How did joe manage to get such a pure and low sound on bob and tom show given that we all know that bluesbreakers

are such damned noisy and loud amps, it's not only a question of fingers and art I suppose

2 (edited by JohnTB 2009-12-24 02:42:10)

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

alan wrote:

How did joe manage to get such a pure and low sound on bob and tom show given that we all know that bluesbreakers

are such damned noisy and loud amps, it's not only a question of fingers and art I suppose


Is that the bluesbreaker or 1974? either way they both sound a bit thin at low volumes... Im guessing he has a pedal infront to get it grinding and the big part of his sound being reverb and delay im guessing he has both them pedals running too...

Also dont forget they are in a sound booth with ear phones on so I'm sure that accounts for a bit of the volume wink

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

are you sure it wasn't a Marshall category 5...? He's been high on that lately.

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

I rather think it's a bluesbreaker for in a precedent reply joe told us and moreover I read in the transatlantic blues power

article on one of joe site he used one and described how he managed to get lower tone(what I had been looking for for

several weeks!)

and besides,when looking at tom and bo show utube, we clearly see that the amp is bigger than a class five

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

Joe Bonamassa wrote:

On Bob and Tom I used my #52 JB les paul a tube screamer, and bluesbreaker combo.  I love the BB combo.  They sound great.
Joe B.

Joe has already confirmed what he used on the show. I think the answer is that he wasn't playing at a low volume. That's why they are in a separate booth, with the whole band playing live. Why are you assuming he was playing at a low volumes?

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

maybe you're right!I desperatey try to find a solution to play this amp at a tolerable level and with a valuable tone(that's

the only condition to buy it) so that I deduct that (according to his description)in the mentioned article  you certainly read,

by lowering or cutting te bass off  on the amp and the drive on the tubescreamer and srtengthening the high of the tone ,

he could get a lowered  more articulate sound,as we can listen to on the show.

Moreover according to my studio experience , I know that engineers don't like musicians to play loud during studio

recordings.

bUT I don't really know if my deductions are right or near the point? what do you think of that?

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

alan wrote:

Moreover according to my studio experience , I know that engineers don't like musicians to play loud during studio

recordings.

bUT I don't really know if my deductions are right or near the point? what do you think of that?

I know that Joe cranks his amps very loud on his studio recordings, so what you're hearing on his records are cranked, tube amp tones.

Here's Joe's low volume home rig from From Jan 2008 if you want some ideas:

Joe Bonamassa wrote:

I should actually explain my home practice low volume rig..  I live in LA at a condo complex.  Very Hollywood types live here.. They have no interest in hearing the bluesboy crank up the jams late at night so I devised a rig for my house ..
1.  1987 Marshall Silver series Marshall 50 watt 1X12 combo..
2  1965 Fender Princeton Reverb or a 1957 Fender Vibrolux with a Kendrick reverb unit
3 THD Hot Plate ( for Princeton Only)
4 paired down pedal board (spare)
   AB/Both switch, Vox Wah , TS 808 RI , Fuchs Audio prototype "Creme " pedal and A boss DD-3 delay.
I get a pretty good approximation of my big rig at TV volume.. You know  watching a Law and Order Marathon and playing guitar at the same time  kinda thing. Can hear the TV and guitar at the same time.. No Broom sticks from below..( been there done that). 
Anyway.. There is always another way to get your tone..
joe bonamassa


I think you should look into an attenuator if you want to tame that BB combo, or check out the marshall class 5 for home use.

Here's what Joe says about them:

Joe Bonamassa wrote:

I actually really like the class 5..  I have one of the first three ever built and use it a lot at home/ dressing room / ect///////.  It sounds straight away like a mini bluesbreaker combo. It has the same voicing and darkness to it.  I was really impressed.  Is it THOR the giant uber rig from a planet far away? no.. Its 5 watts. Now if you link 8 of em up like I did at Ronnie Scotts.. Yeah you ll get there.   It is a good 5 watts with lots of headroom. You guys know me by now I would never say it if I didnt think it was good.  $400 is a good price for it too..  its built in the UK. Anyway my two cents..
Joe B

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

alan wrote:

Moreover according to my studio experience , I know that engineers don't like musicians to play loud during studio

recordings.

Ha! This would be the first sound engeneer I know who claim that.
I mean, especially in the studio you try to get the best out of your amps
for the recording. Most studios have isolated rooms for the amps.
Here you have no trouble like a live situation where you can't crank the amps.
Any sound guy who can't handle high amp volume signals (even live) should stand
behind a McDonalds bar instead of a mixing desk. wink (except small clubs where
signals interfere).
But I do remember my BB wasn't that loud to cut the hair of the front row.
With a decent TS or kind of you should be fine really. They are great amps.
Did I mention I once stupidly sold mine..? Wish I had it back.

Alex

...it's a musical journey
www.u2-experience.de

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

All right thanks for your interesting replies!

The best way will be to go and try one with and without a tubescreamer and I'll make my mind thats the best way for I'm

not satisfied with my HK DUAL EL 84 any longer.I can't get no satisfaction!

since I discovered joe sound on bob and tom I am completely obsessed by this sound , a sound I've always been looking

for! and I think I can't get such a tone from EL 84s yet it's known to be an excellent amp

besides, it's true that nowadays everywhere you play, people don't bear loud amps anymore and often I've been criticized

for I was playing  (so called) too loud!Even my own bass player doesn't bear loud amps!

Re: HOW DID JOE MANAGE TO GET SUCH A TAMED TONE WITH HIS BLUESBREAKER

As far as the class 5 is concerned, I don't know if they are really reliable, for the music shop next to my home had to bring

back three of them for technical problems and moreover ,I 'll have to do with the same problems , this sort of amp is loaded

with el 84 too as my hk  dual el 84 and what'smore, they don't prove to be versatile and articulate.When you hear most

utube tests they often sound muddy and loud.

And concerning the marshall 1974,it's loaded with EL84 too and doesn't seems to sound so good!

Perhaps,the marshal 205c will be the right choice for it's a combo with three channels, powerfull and versatile with which

you can create  and register your own sounds, not that loud and heavy,small sized,and very articulate, maybe we could

approach bluesbreaker sounds but with a master to tame the whole thing.

i don't know what the haze 40 and the MA 50 C are worth ,did some of you try them?

Anyway before choosing, I have to secure my mind for it costs a lot!