SOFTMC wrote:Hi
I dont understand this DI to the PA that the sound guy talks about ? does this mean that the sound from tha amp goes directly to the PA . surely to get the true sound of the amp , you need to mic the speaker.? or do I mis-understand,
Justin the 2 rock would be nice but I would be interested to hear the difference with your HRM and would it justify the extra money . Derek
Yes, if you check out the PD-I03 on the Palmer website it has a diagram that shows a signal path like this: Guitar--amplifier--Palmer PDI-03--mixing board/recording device/PA/etc. According to the website and the diagram you don't need a speaker cabinet AT ALL! That's VERY attractive to me because I'm lazy and hate lugging tons of heavy gear just to get great tone. Joe states that for him, the Palmer gets him 90% of the way there compared to his cabs loaded with EV's. 90% is good enough for me especially if I could save my spine in the process!
Anyways, in regards to the Two-Rock vs. Ceriatone HRM thing I'm sure that they sound different enough. From what I gather the CRS is not a HRM style amp at all and it also has included reverb. If you believe in "mojo" and hi fi parts the Two-Rock ought to sound better, but that hasn't always been my experience with amps. Sometimes those crappy 'ole PCB or overseas built amps just sound better (or at least as good). I have always loved the sound of Two-Rock amps and the CRS been on my dream wishlist for a while now. If I get the amplifier I will definately post some demos and comparisons with the the Ceriatone. I bet they are closer than a lot of people would like to believe .
'67 and '74 Fender Twin Reverbs, '74 Marshall 1987 lead mkII, Metro Superlead 100. Pedals from TC Electronic, Ibanez, Dunlop, BK Butler, Electro-Harmonix, Fulltone, Maestro/Gibson, Loopmaster switching, VoodooLab, Boss. Gibson and Fender guitars, Dimarzio pickups.