Topic: Gibson LPs...Standard, Traditional or Traditional Pro
Hi all,
First time post from a long time lurker. I'm currently thinking of buying a new Les Paul and was wondering what you guys think. I had a 96 Standard a few years back and loved it...I believe that model was weight relieved but not chambered. Of the current stable of new Gibby's which would you choose? There's little chance I can afford a custom or signature model, so of the three mentioned in the post title which one takes your fancy?
Also, the difference between the Traditional and Traditional Pro...locking tuners and 60s neck on the Pro..what else? Is it true the Pro has a plain top?
What about pickups...57s on the Trad and Trad Pro...Burstbuckers on the Standard right? What's the difference there? My old 96 standard had the 490 498 combination and I found them a little dark.
Is it still the case that the quality control is a bit dodgy? How safe would you feel ordering online? Ideally I would like to play as many as I could before buying but finding that many LPs in the west of Ireland is kinda impossible.
After some internet research I'm leaning toward a Traditional in Desert Burst but I'd like your opinions also.
If I go ahead with a purchase I'll be plugging my new baby into my Silver Jube combo.....best amp I've ever had (or even played through for that matter)...and I picked it up a year and a half ago for the princely sum of €375 believe it or not Actually it was while researching the amp that I found this place and discovered Joe....I'm a big fan now. Hope to see him at the Cork Opera House in December, where my fellow countryman, the late great Rory Gallagher tore it up.
Thanks all,
Felim.