Yamaha like most if not all Japanese factories turn out high quality goods, so much so that their economic situation is thought by some to be as a result of them making too high a quality goods and then selling them too cheaply, - as opposed to cutting corners and appealing to the mass market.
I think that I read somewhere something along the lines of Joe played Yamaha acoustic because his style of playing beats the hell out of an acoustic so they become a disposable item, and at the price it does become an issue. Joe is about sound quality so I do not believe he plays rubbish, - so it is perhaps a good compromise, - would hate to wreck a Gibson Humingbird every night!
Interesting to read of the negative aspect of them as a corporation making so many products that it detracts from the appeal of owning one of their guitars... Interestingly this is why the Lexus brand was born... Like many Japanese corporations they have many divisions, - look at Hitachi as an example. Their instrument am is completely separate from motorbikes, etc. - Funny how a brand like `fender would probably be perceived as a good name brand yet my guess would be that some of their branded guitars might come out of far eastern factories manufacturing for multiple brands...Some of their prices are just so low. - I see this because right now my so is wanting a small bodied electro acoustic and he is looking at the Fender Tim Armstrong Hellcat and the Yamaha APX500II... To my eye and ear the Yamaha is the better guitar but he likes the name on the other..
My YouTube channel with plenty of my Joe's videos dating from 2009 inc his first Hammersmith Odeon ones:
http://www.youtube.com/ian916fun