Topic: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

Hey guys, someone is offering me a Fulltone OCD for a reasonable price.  It is the v3 version.  Any thoughts?

Amp: Firebird Musical Amplifiers
Guitars:62 LP SG , 02 FB VII, JB FB I, 76 Electra Omega, 64 Firebird V, 73 LPC, 61 Custom Tele, 59 and 60 Melody Maker
Effects: Mythos Chupacabra, Strymon Deco/Flint

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

Look up Gearmanndude on youtube he has a OCD shootout with 3 different verisons, to me they all sound within a video close to being equal.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xht70sagx8

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

AD3THREE wrote:

Look up Gearmanndude on youtube he has a OCD shootout with 3 different verisons, to me they all sound within a video close to being equal.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xht70sagx8

Yeah, I had just watched that and with the crappy compression youtube offers it is difficult to tell.  I guess i really don't need another drive pedal anyhow... or do i?  big_smile

Amp: Firebird Musical Amplifiers
Guitars:62 LP SG , 02 FB VII, JB FB I, 76 Electra Omega, 64 Firebird V, 73 LPC, 61 Custom Tele, 59 and 60 Melody Maker
Effects: Mythos Chupacabra, Strymon Deco/Flint

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

If it's an OCD, you do. I run two of them and they're fantastic. Great tone and dynamically responsive too.

"Another song, another mile." - The Black Crowes

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

OCD's are all great pedals.  I thought it was too much overdrive but it sounded killer with my Telecaster.  Its the only pedal i really loved with the Tele.  It made it sound like an avalanche mixed with a lion roar, mixed with a train hitting a truck transporting a nuke.

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

Dammit, now I am thinking about it hard!

Amp: Firebird Musical Amplifiers
Guitars:62 LP SG , 02 FB VII, JB FB I, 76 Electra Omega, 64 Firebird V, 73 LPC, 61 Custom Tele, 59 and 60 Melody Maker
Effects: Mythos Chupacabra, Strymon Deco/Flint

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

What's the difference between a OCD and Fulldrive II MOSFET?
Why would you get the OCD over one?

Sorry if this has been asked before. I just got the Fulldrive 2

- Nic from Detroit... posting on JB's Forum since 6-2-2006
Ask me about my handwound Great Lakes Guitar Pickups
Since 2010, Bonamassa fans have taken advantage of my JB friend discount = my cost + shipping. cool

8 (edited by t92780 2010-11-12 12:32:53)

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

http://www.fulltone.com/stpframe.asp

I would do some research on their site and or call Fulltone.  I own both pedals, Fulldrive is a nice Tubescreamer pedal, that has been discussed here a zillion time----if what you need is to simply boost your already cranked amp that has natural OD going on for a solo, etc it's your choice.  If you want to play at bedroom levels, but want to simulate your clean tube amp to sound like it's cranked...this pedal is great.

If you want more gain options than above, I would lean towards OCD, but OCD get be set mild, case in point: When I first heard OCD pedal live, was in Austin and this SRV cover band guitar player simply used a Strat, Fender Super Reverb and OCD and he nailed SRV...helped he was great player...., impressed me enough that I bought one when I got home.

I confuse you ...lol.

Mosfet has a boost switch is nice, but pedal is on larger side.  OCD has more gain to get you more Heavy Blues to Hard Rock tones and comes in a tiny stomp box.

Buying both would be a great choice.  I would put OCD first and FD II after...makes for an inexpensive great stacked OD set-up.

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

They are very different pedals.  The OCD is more metallic than the Fulldrive.  The OCD has lots more volume and gain on tap.  It is a heavy overdrive pedal.  The Fulldrive is less overdrive, more organic, more creamy.  I really love the fulldrive. Its a great pedal. 

The OCD will take a fender or any single coil guitar into high gain territory, but I had some feedback issues...

Both are great pedals and I had both on my board for awile.

10 (edited by matt77 2010-11-16 05:42:47)

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

I have the OCD version 4. The other guy in my band has the OCD version 3.
The taper of the controls is different. The version 3 seems to bring on the gain quicker on the dials.
We experimented by turning everything up to ten and putting them side by side in the chain through the same amp and guitar.
There is very little difference, they both have as much volume and gain.
The audience wouldn't notice, I couldn't say one is better than the other.
Essentially they can do the same tones but to get them you may have to put the dials in slightly different places on each pedal.

If it's cheap, buy it. You won't lose money moving it on e-bay if you don't like it

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

Well here is the dilemma:  what I am really looking for is a better signal boost, namely to give my Firebirds a bit more girth all around.  I have been considering the Diaz Texas Ranger as an option as it has 3 different boost frequencies.  I know Warren Haynes uses that to match certain tonal characteristics of his Firebirds to his LP's. The drawback is the germanium bit inside that is temperature dependent and whatnot.  So maybe the combination of my BB Preamp with the OCD would give me the same result.  The clean boost i use now is I guess the real issue, since if I use that with my overdriven tone I get a huge boost, and if i use it when the amp is clean, the boost is not enough to cut...  tonal dilemmas indeed....

Amp: Firebird Musical Amplifiers
Guitars:62 LP SG , 02 FB VII, JB FB I, 76 Electra Omega, 64 Firebird V, 73 LPC, 61 Custom Tele, 59 and 60 Melody Maker
Effects: Mythos Chupacabra, Strymon Deco/Flint

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

Have you tried the Xotic EP boost? Expensive but good. It took me 5 seconds to decide I was going to buy one after I tried one. There is a decent amount of boost on the OCD.

Presuming your amp is single channel, it can be tough to balance boost levels across clean and dirty tones, with the click of a single footswitch.

The Phil Hilbourne Thunder Tomate is something I haven't tried, but I hear a lot of good things about.

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

The OCD is not somthing I'd use for a boost. It is a high gain pedal. Even with the gain almost off its still got good amouts of overdrive. So I'd look for a boost pedal if thats what you need.  I really like the Fatboost 3 from Fulltone.  I place mine before my Fulldrive and have it as a totally clean boost. You can adjust the Treble and Bass so it allows you to tailor what you want added to whatever you put after it.
Great pedal.

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

Yeah I owned the Fat Boost for about a week and had to let it go because it just was not cutting it for me.  I just picked up a HBE Germania for super cheap and will get it monday.  I used to love my Beano Boost, but had to sell a bunch of gear to raise funds for a vehicle and that went...  not wanting to spend a ton, and liking the demos I hear, I think the Germania having the treble boost I like plus some EQ will do the trick.  I own a few other treble boosters and I always liked that tone.

Amp: Firebird Musical Amplifiers
Guitars:62 LP SG , 02 FB VII, JB FB I, 76 Electra Omega, 64 Firebird V, 73 LPC, 61 Custom Tele, 59 and 60 Melody Maker
Effects: Mythos Chupacabra, Strymon Deco/Flint

Re: Pros and Cons of Different Fulltone OCD's

I have the version 3 and the other guitarist in my band has the version 4.  I would say Matt77 is spot on with his description of the two pedals.   I think the OCD is an outstanding pedal for adding a Marshall crunch to a clean amp, especially old Fenders.  But I don't like it for a stand alone lead pedal.  You need to hit it with a tubescreamer or other mid based pedal to make it cut and sing.