19 (edited by Greenose 2008-12-29 02:13:25)

Re: Eric Czar on Youtube

Here's a question for all you Clapton fans: when do you ever hear a blues band, or rock band say here's a song written by Eric Clapton?
The truth is you don't. Whilst there is no doubt that Clapton recording some of the earliest British blues rock with the Yardbirds and did a superb blues album with John Mayall (his best output) and was innovative with Cream, he really has not left a huge impression on the blues rock scene at all. He has actually written so few blues rock songs of note himself, er maybe Layla (the best part of which was recorded by Allman) and Sunshine of Your Love (a cowrite). His contemporaries like Hendrix, Peter Green, Page and Rory Gallagher left us with classic song after classic song, Clapton did not. He was great as a guitar for hire, but as a solo artist he has done very little at all.  Even when he returned to the blues for From The Cradle, the songs he chose where well worn blues standards rather than producing anything creative. Clapton lost his fire nearly 40 years ago, and is not worthy of the praise that so many (admittedly Americans) seem to give him. Never has one with such god given talent provided so little, its a crime!

"The recently formed Edinburgh Blues Club has identified an appetite for the personal communication between musicians and audience that the blues long ago perfected." The Herald Newspaper (Scotland)
http://www.edinburgh-blues.uk

20 (edited by Deezer 2008-12-29 03:14:02)

Re: Eric Czar on Youtube

It's not all about the guitar bro. Clapton has created many timeless songs that will be remembered, and are remembered. Far more than anything Peter Green ever did. Heck, the band he was in had more famous songs after he left. Oops, sorry, it's not in the blues/rock genre, sorry for expanding a bit.

For me, it's the whole package with Clapton. It's his voice, his guitar playing, his songwriting (or choice of material). Truth be told, he's done more than his fair share in the music world. So what if it's not the blues? Why do we get onto Clapton for that, then applaud Joe Bonamassa for expanding the boundaries? Lost his fire? I'm sorry, it may not rip snorting electric guitar, but Tears In Heaven is one of the most passionate songs he ever did. Unless, you know, songs about the death of his son aren't that big of a thing for him, just another run of the mill let's do another song kind of thing. The production was s***, but Pilgrim has some good songs on it. I don't particularly care for My Father's Eyes, River Of Tears, or She's Gone off of Pilgrim, but when done live those songs smoked. And besides, watching the Crossroads Festival provides more than enough proof that Clapton's still got it. By the truckload.

Clapton did enough as a blues artist to have people like B.B. King, Buddy Guy, and others praise him and give him thanks for what he did for the blues. No other blues artist I know of outside of Stevie Ray Vaughan has been as generous as far as giving back to his heroes. He is to be applauded for that.

My whole opinion is, when you've had as much influence as Clapton, then maybe you can claim that he's overrated. But until that point, he deserves every single ounce of respect and adulation he receives. No if's, and's, or but's.

And yes, for the record, I've been to quite a few local shows where bands have done Clapton songs. If they weren't originals, they were songs he's made popular. If you put your stamp on it enough, a cover becomes your own (ask Joe). So, should we not count if somebody does Clapton's version of Crossroads because he didn't write the original? Or Cocaine? Or After Midnight? I'm sorry, that's not Clapton's fault that he's more popular than the guy who wrote the songs.

"And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make"

My ReverbNation page for Dees & Friends - check us out!
www.reverbnation.com/deesfriends

Re: Eric Czar on Youtube

Deezer, I appreciate your views differ from mine, and should anyone have an appetite for it, I am happy to display my views on a Clapton opinion type thread in the future, as I'm aware we are off topic. I will elaborate though on my thoughts.

First point I’d like to address through is about Peter Green, much of the work that he did even with Fleetwood Mac was not strictly blues. While the first two albums were superb blues rock which had has been highly influential and covered by artists as diverse as Santana, Aerosmith and Gary Moore, his latter work covered a far greater range. Albatross was a superb instrumental which impressed even classical music fans. Need Your Love So Bad was blues with string before BB King recorded The Thrill Has Gone. While Clapton was recording Layla, Green was recording Oh Well, both of which go beyond blues rock. Whilst Layla features nice piano and slide, Oh Well part two is classical acoustic guitar.  Green was recording tracks as mournful as Tears In Heaven back in 1969 with Man Of The World. Green Manalishi was prototype heavy metal. Peter Green’s solo career was blighted by mental illness, yet he still managed to dabble with African and Asian influences, Clapton simply went for a pop rock angle which while more successful, was not particularly distinctive. Wasn't it BB King himself who told Clapton and George Harrison that Peter Green was a better player?

My own view is that whilst his work with Yardbirds, Mayall and Cream in particular was influential and I love most of it, there's little merit to be found in Clapton's solo career which has not been innovative to my ears (maybe he works best with a Mayall or Bruce along side).  I suspect Clapton’s solo career has been a disappointment to even him.  Take a look at the setlist he plays these days, full of blues standards, if he wrote so many timeless songs, why doesn't he play them?

I personally find even Clapton’s blues covers to be disappointing. When he has gone back to the blues he has chosen the well trodden blues standards that you can find on any blues compilation, Hoochie Coochie Man, Reconsider Baby, Five Long Years, Double Trouble.  While back in Cream he recording bang up to date versions of songs such as Crossroads and Spoonful, his recent version of Travelling Riverside Blues from his Robert Johnson album (a well covered artist if there ever was one) takes it forward no further than Muddy Water’s Louisiana Blues.  As Joe himself has said, the covers you record help define you as an artist, Clapton however has chosen to record blues covers easily found elsewhere. Compare that to say Rory Gallagher and you will see a difference, Gallagher was prepared to find obscure tracks by the likes of Blind Boy Fuller, Bo Carter and Tony Joe White and put his own style on them, he would also play celtic and country tunes, even jazz.  Much in the same way a casual blues rock fan may only listen to Clapton and Stevie Ray Vaughan, Clapton has not studied hard when it comes to the blues.  My closing statement would probably be that I’d urge those of you who listen regularly to artists such as Clapton and Vaughan to expand your listening tastes to less heralded guys like Green, Gallagher, Kossoff, Beck etc, Joe has and the benefit can be heard in his music.  Happy New Year!

"The recently formed Edinburgh Blues Club has identified an appetite for the personal communication between musicians and audience that the blues long ago perfected." The Herald Newspaper (Scotland)
http://www.edinburgh-blues.uk

22

Re: Eric Czar on Youtube

Interesting discussion (even though off topic....).

Speaking of covers - isn´t that what Blues is all about?! I think one of Clapton´s biggest achievements is that he has made songs popular to a wide range of listeners who wouldn´t have wasted a thought on what is called "the Blues" otherwise. He carried on the torch if you want to say so ... I think the essence of Bluesmusic is carrying on the old themes, keeping their soul or what is essential about them while adapting them for a new generation. That´s what Eric Clapton did in my eyes ...

Go out on the street and ask people about Blues musicians - they will know Eric Clapton and not too many more. Not even B.B.King or John Lee Hooker or Muddy Waters maybe ...

I tend to agree with Greenose that Clapton has done a lot of "standard" stuff that isn´t outstanding in my eyes (the good old question: why is it Eric Clapton who has become the superstar of the Blues?! wink), but he has also done a lot of songs that have survived the generations, because they are timeless and soulful (thinking of "Layla" for example even though it´s a cliche maybe).

I´ll open a new topic for further discussion ....

Eva

23 (edited by Deezer 2008-12-29 14:07:53)

Re: Eric Czar on Youtube

Greenose wrote:

Deezer, I appreciate your views differ from mine, and should anyone have an appetite for it, I am happy to display my views on a Clapton opinion type thread in the future, as I'm aware we are off topic. I will elaborate though on my thoughts.

First point I’d like to address through is about Peter Green, much of the work that he did even with Fleetwood Mac was not strictly blues. While the first two albums were superb blues rock which had has been highly influential and covered by artists as diverse as Santana, Aerosmith and Gary Moore, his latter work covered a far greater range. Albatross was a superb instrumental which impressed even classical music fans. Need Your Love So Bad was blues with string before BB King recorded The Thrill Has Gone. While Clapton was recording Layla, Green was recording Oh Well, both of which go beyond blues rock. Whilst Layla features nice piano and slide, Oh Well part two is classical acoustic guitar.  Green was recording tracks as mournful as Tears In Heaven back in 1969 with Man Of The World. Green Manalishi was prototype heavy metal. Peter Green’s solo career was blighted by mental illness, yet he still managed to dabble with African and Asian influences, Clapton simply went for a pop rock angle which while more successful, was not particularly distinctive. Wasn't it BB King himself who told Clapton and George Harrison that Peter Green was a better player?

My own view is that whilst his work with Yardbirds, Mayall and Cream in particular was influential and I love most of it, there's little merit to be found in Clapton's solo career which has not been innovative to my ears (maybe he works best with a Mayall or Bruce along side).  I suspect Clapton’s solo career has been a disappointment to even him.  Take a look at the setlist he plays these days, full of blues standards, if he wrote so many timeless songs, why doesn't he play them?

I personally find even Clapton’s blues covers to be disappointing. When he has gone back to the blues he has chosen the well trodden blues standards that you can find on any blues compilation, Hoochie Coochie Man, Reconsider Baby, Five Long Years, Double Trouble.  While back in Cream he recording bang up to date versions of songs such as Crossroads and Spoonful, his recent version of Travelling Riverside Blues from his Robert Johnson album (a well covered artist if there ever was one) takes it forward no further than Muddy Water’s Louisiana Blues.  As Joe himself has said, the covers you record help define you as an artist, Clapton however has chosen to record blues covers easily found elsewhere. Compare that to say Rory Gallagher and you will see a difference, Gallagher was prepared to find obscure tracks by the likes of Blind Boy Fuller, Bo Carter and Tony Joe White and put his own style on them, he would also play celtic and country tunes, even jazz.  Much in the same way a casual blues rock fan may only listen to Clapton and Stevie Ray Vaughan, Clapton has not studied hard when it comes to the blues.  My closing statement would probably be that I’d urge those of you who listen regularly to artists such as Clapton and Vaughan to expand your listening tastes to less heralded guys like Green, Gallagher, Kossoff, Beck etc, Joe has and the benefit can be heard in his music.  Happy New Year!

We were talking about influence, not how diverse someone is. As you said, how many bands today say, today we're going to play a Peter Green song? Green can record whatever he wanted to, but the point of the matter is, these "bands" are probably going to play two songs: "Oh Well" and "Black Magic Woman," and one of them they're probably going to think is by Santana. I love Peter Green quite a bit, but come on, if we're talking influence over the electric guitar, over music in general, it's not even a question. And I believe it is really overgeneralizing to say Clapton just went the pop angle. That's just utter bullcrap. I'm sorry, but how are songs like Let It Grow and Lay Down Sally and Promises pop? Heck, two of them are old-school country!

And I will say that most of your points about Clapton doing blues covers reference two albums: From The Cradle and Me & Mr. Johnson. Two albums where he said explicitly he wanted to pay tribute.

Clapton hasn't studied the blues very hard? My "friend," you know nothing about Eric Clapton. Clapton has forgotten more about the blues than most of us here will ever know. I disagree vehemently with everything you say about Clapton. There is a distinct reason why he's Eric Clapton, and we're sitting here talking about Eric Clapton. In the end, let the haters hate, because he's still THE Eric Clapton, the most influential guitar player right there with Hendrix, Page, Vaughan, Beck, and Van Halen.

"And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make"

My ReverbNation page for Dees & Friends - check us out!
www.reverbnation.com/deesfriends

Re: Eric Czar on Youtube

So in closing, we agree that Eric Czar is a talent (a force to be reckoned with) & we wish him all the best.  Done!

nuff said.

Rock On & Keep the FAITH
             It is
Blues From the Bottoms

Re: Eric Czar on Youtube

Way off Topic I thought I was on the Eric Clapton thread till Jeff posted a closing thought. Eric was the man back then and Carimine is the man now. Night and Day difference in playing styles and pesonalities. I appreciate them both feel lucky to of gotten to know them both.